CRWP-5195 IN THE (168 ) AKHLIMA STATE OF CORAM: Present: MANISHA B 1. Constitution o the official re petitioners at their represent 2. submitted tha 02.05.2026 be raising their g has not yet b 5195-2026 (O&M) (1) THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB CHANDIGARH Da MA AND ANOTHER Versus
OF HARYANA AND OTHERS HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MA Mr. Azad Khan, Advocate for the Ms. Himani Arora, DAG, Haryan ****
HA BATRA, J. (ORAL) The present petition has been fil tion of India seeking issuance of a w cial respondents No.1 to 3 to protect rs at the hands of respondents No.4 resentation dated 02.05.2026 (Annexu At the very outset, learned coun d that the petitioners have recently 26 before the Superintendent of Po heir grievances as mentioned in the p yet been considered and no action h JAB AND HARYANA AT ARH
CRWP-5195-2026 (O&M) Date of decision : 04.05.2026 ... Petitioners
...Respondents E MANISHA BATRA
for the petitioners aryana een filed under Article 226 of the of a writ of mandamus directing rotect the life and liberty of the No.4 to 7 and to take action on nnexure P-4). d counsel for the petitioners has cently filed a representation on of Police, Nuh (Annexure P-4) the present petition but the same tion has been taken thereon. He AMIT SHARMA 2026.05.04 19:35 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. CRWP-5195 further submit appropriate di Police, Nuh to and take neces 3. 4. behalf of the r in due course during the cou 5. commenting a disposed of at aforesaid rep petitioners wit order in accord petitioners, the in order to pro
04.05.2026 Amit Sharma 5195-2026 (O&M) (2) submitted that at this stage, the petiti iate directions are issued to responde Nuh to decide the aforesaid representa necessary action thereon. Notice of motion. Ms. Himani Arora, DAG, Harya f the respondents-State and submits th course. Let a complete set of the pap he course of the day. In view of the limited prayer mad ting anything on the merits of the c of at this stage with a direction to res d representation dated 02.05.2026 rs within a period of 15 days from to accordance with law. Needless to say, rs, the official respondents would pro to protect their life and liberty. Whether speaking/reasoned:
   petitioners would be satisfied if spondent No.2-Superintendent of resentation filed by the petitioners aryana, has advance notice on mits that the needful will be done he paperbook be supplied to her r made by the petitioners, without f the case, the present petition is to respondent No.2 to decide the .2026 (Annexure P-4) of the rom today, by passing a speaking to say, if any threat is found to the ld provide them adequate security (MANISHA BATRA)
JUDGE
ned:- Yes/No

AMIT SHARMA 2026.05.04 19:35 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.