2026:JHHC:4801 -1- A.B.A. No. 6432 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND, RANCHI ---- A.B.A. No. 6432 of 2025 ---- Rasul Shekh, aged about 46 years son of late Kamu @ Kamrul Haque, resident of Village Nawada, PO Pakur, PS Pakur(M), District Pakur .... Petitioner -- Versus -- The State of Jharkhand .... Opposite Party ---- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI --- For the Petitioner :- Mr. Ashutosh Kr Sinha, Advocate For the State :- Mrs. Amrita Sinha, Advocate ---- 3/18.02.2026 Heard learned counsels for petitioner and for State. 2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Pakur (M)Case No.138 of 2025, for offence registered under section 333, 127(2), 115(2), 117(2), 109(1), 74, 76, 352, 351(2) read with 3(5) of BNS, 2023, pending in court of learned S.D.J.M., Pakur. 3. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case and false allegations are made of assault and molestation and on these grounds, he submits that anticipatory bail may kindly be granted to the petitioner. 4. Learned State counsel opposes prayer and submits that serious allegations are there of molestation and assault and it has come in paragraph no.52 of the case diary wherein injury has been recorded and it is said to be grievous and the informant has again 2026:JHHC:4801 -2- A.B.A. No. 6432 of 2025 restated all the incident in paragraph no.14 of the case diary and independent witnesses have also supported the case and on these grounds, he submits that anticipatory bail to the petitioner may not be granted. She also submits that one of the co-accused has already been arrested. 5. In the FIR there is serious allegations of molestation against the petitioner and injury is also received on the body of the husband and the son of the informant and that has come in paragraph no.52 of case diary and in paragraph no.14 of case diary the informant has stated the incident and independent witnesses have supported the prosecution version, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner, and hence, the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is, hereby, rejected, and consequently, A.B.A. No.6432 of 2025 is dismissed. ( Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) 18.02.2026 SI/