APHC010348792026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE 24th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA WRIT PETITION NO: 18577 OF 2026 Between: 1. THAMBELA MARUTHI, W/o T. Venugopal Reddy, Aged about 34 years, Occ Housewife, R/o Door No. 13/56, Kothaindlu, Mandaram Post, Rajampeta Mandal, YSR Kadapa District-516126 ...Petitioner AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, Rep. by It's Principal Secretary, MA AND UD Department, Secretary, Velagapudi, Amaravathi-522503. 2. Tirupati Urban Development Authority TUDA, Rep. by its Vice Chairman, Tirupati, Tirupati District-517501. 3. The Panchayat Secretary, Srinivasapuram Grama Panchayat, Tirupati Rural Mandal, Tirupati District-517620 ...Respondents Counsel for the Petitioner: SOMISETTY GANESH BABU Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR MUNCIPAL ADMN URBAN DEV Counsel for the Respondents:Karri kalyan Durga Prasad SC FOR TUDA 2 The Court made the following order: Heard Sri Somisetty Ganesh Babu, learned cousnel for the petitioner, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Municipal Administration and urban Development and Sri Karri kalyan Durga Prasad, learned Standing Counsel for TUDA appearing for the respondents. 2. The grievance of the petitioner in the instant Writ Petition is against the action of the respondents in attempting to dispossess the petitioner from her residential plot/property of an extent of 121 Square Yards in Survey No.257/11 B2 of Srinivasapuram Village, Tirupati Rural Mandal, Tirupati District. 3. It is contended by the petitioner that she is the absolute owner of the subject property having purchased the same vide Registered Sale Deed dated 20.11.2024, without issuing any show cause notice, without calling for an explanation and without following due process of law, the respondents are trying to dispossess the petitioner from the subject property. 4. It is further contended that the 2nd and 3rd respondents without any manner of right, title or interest are highhandedly trying to dispossess the petitioner from the absolute property. The office staff and field staff of respondents Nos.1 & 2, accompanied by men and machinery have attempted to demolish the existing boundary demarcations and forcefully would dispossess the petitioner from the subject property. 3 5. Having regard to the above, this Court deems it appropriate to dispose of the Writ Petition with a direction to the respondents not to interfere with the subject property of the petitioner without following the due process of law. 6. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA Date: 24.09.2026 BAK/EV 4 155 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA WRIT PETITION NO: 18577 OF 2026 Date: 24.09.2026 BAK/EV