( 1 ) 903-WP-2928-2012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 903 WRIT PETITION NO. 2928 OF 2012 Savita Shivaji Gaike VERSUS The Union Of India And Ors ... Mr. Bhushan V. Virdhe, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mr. R. S. Sarvadnya, Senior Panel Counsel, for Respondent No.1. CORAM : KISHORE C. SANT & JITENDRA JAIN, JJ. DATE : 22nd SEPTEMBER 2026. PC :- 1. Learned Advocate for the petitioner informs that he could not establish the contact with petitioner. Office note shows that by efflux of time, the prayers in this petition have become infructuous. 2. Prayer clauses (B) and (C) read as under: “(B). By issuing writ of Mandamus or any writ, order or direction in like nature the respondent No.2 & 3 may kindly directed to extend the proposal of petitioner under the PMEGP-Scheme and withheld the money (Margin Money/Subsidy) sanctioned for the project proposal of Poultry Seed of the petitioner. (C). By issuing writ, order or direction in like nature the respondent No.2 & 3 may kindly be directed to consider the proposal under PMEGP scheme of present petitioner for the year 2011-12.” ( 2 ) 903-WP-2928-2012 3. From the prayers, it is clear that it was only a proposal made to the respondents/authorities which was sought to be decided at the earliest. Petition is filed and pending since 2012. By now, nothing remains in the petition to be adjudicated or decided. The scheme is already over in 2012. 4. Considering above, this Court finds that petition deserves to be dismissed. The same is hereby dismissed. [JITENDRA JAIN, J.] [KISHORE C. SANT, J.] D.A.ETHAPE