Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 33033 of 2026 Court No. - 69 HON'BLE AVNISH SAXENA, J.
1. Supplementary affidavit has been filed explaining criminal history, the same is taken on record. 1A. Heard Sri Aryan Srivastava, learned counsel for accused applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State. 2. The present bail application has been moved by the applicant accused- Pawan Yadav to enlarge him on bail in Case Crime No. 236 of 2026, under Sections 109(1), 115(2), 351(3) of BNS, P.S.- Deogaon, District- Azamgarh during the pendency of trial. 3. It is the contention of learned counsel for accused applicant that the accused applicant has been implicated in FIR dated 23.6.2026 lodged by Ramesh Rajbhar with the allegation against three named accused persons including the accused applicant that on 22.6.2026 at about 19:00 hrs, they had assaulted Sunil and Satish, both the sons of brother-in-law of the informant. The assault was due to old enmity. Sunil suffered two injuries and both are simple in nature. Satish suffered one injury, which is fracture of left temproal bone. It is further contended that the accused applicant has been falsely implicated. There is recovery of danda at the instance of accused applicant, which was from the open space and there is no independent witness. The charge sheet has been submitted. The applicant has one case criminal history, wherein, he is on bail. The applicant is languishing in jail since 10.7.2026. He seeks enlargement of accused on bail. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Aryan Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Pawan Yadav .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s)
4. Learned A.G.A. has opposed the bail application. 5. This Court has taken into consideration the rival submissions made by learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. 6. Considering the nature and number of injury and number of accused, the accused applicant is entitled to be enlarged on bail. 7. Hence, without touching merit of the case, the bail application is allowed. 8. The accused/applicant be released on bail in the aforesaid case on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of court concerned in view of observation made by the Supreme Court in its dictums of Girish Gandhi Vs.
State of Uttar Pradesh [(2024) 10 SCC 674] and Policy Strategy for grant of bail in re [(2024)10SCC 685]. 9. The accused-applicant shall cooperate in judicial process for fair and speedy disposal. September 30, 2026 Krishna* BAIL No. 33033 of 2026 2 (Avnish Saxena,J.) Digitally signed by :- KRISHNA KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad