[2026:RJ-JP:38210] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 6835/2026 CNR: RJHC010785592026 | URN: CRLMP / 12002U / 2026 1. Kavita D/o Oma Ram, Aged About 20 Years, R/o Village Kokunda, Tehsil And District Jodhpur 2. Javaru Ram S/o Bhola Ram, Aged About 23 Years, R/o Bakaliyas Tehsil And District Nagaur. ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary Department Of Home Affairs Government Of Rajasthan Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. The Commissioner Of Police, Jodhpur 3. The Superintendent Of Poice, Nagaur 4. The Sho, Police Station Dangiyawas, District Jodhpur. 5. Arvind S/o Laxman Ram, R/o Nandari, District, Jodhpur. 6. Laxman Ram S/o Pancha Ram, R/o Nandari, District Jodhpur. 7. Chuki Devi W/o Oma Ram, R/o Kokunda, Police Station Dangiyawas, Jodhpur. 8. Oma Ram S/o Dhula Ram, R/o Kokunda, Police Station Dangiyawas, Jodhpur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Harendra Singh Inda For Respondent(s) : Mr. Prem Singh Panwar, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP MATHUR Order 10/08/2026 The criminal writ petition has been preferred by the petitioners under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking direction for being provided with adequate security and protection. [2026:RJ-JP:38210] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-6835/2026] The petitioners both being major persons claim to be in a live in relationship. They submit that they are living with each other against the wishes of their parents and thus, they feel threat at the hands of private respondents, who are their relatives. The petitioners allegedly approached the concerned respondent authorities with a prayer to be provided with adequate protection but no heed has been paid to their request so far. The documents pertaining to the age of the petitioners and an ikrarnama verifying the factum of them being in a live in relationship have been filed on record. Thus, taking cue from the judgment rendered by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Lata Singh Vs. State of U.P. Reported in AIR 2006 SC 2522, the prayer made by the petitioners for directing the concerned respondent authorities to provide protection to the petitioners deserves to be accepted. The concerned respondent authorities shall have the matter enquired into and if so required, appropriate protection shall be provided to the petitioners as and when warranted. The concerned respondent authorities shall ensure that no harm is caused to the petitioners, who are in a live in relationship. The criminal writ petition is accordingly disposed of. (KULDEEP MATHUR),J 88/Divya Raj Jasmatiya