RAM NARAYAN RAJBHAR AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS
WRIC/39612/2026 · 2026-09-29
Saurabh Shyam Shamshery
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 11692 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 11692 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 39612 of 2026 Court No. - 36 HON'BLE SAURABH SHYAM SHAMSHERY, J.
1. Heard Ms. Kusum Lata, learned counsel for petitioners and Sri Vipul Kumar, learned counsel for respondent-insurance company.
2. Learned counsel for petitioners, after arguing for some time, fairly submits that petitioners may be permitted to file an application before Permanent Lok Adalat to raise claim of pendente lite interest.
3. Learned counsel for respondent-insurance company submits that in such any such application is filed, it may be observed that no order be passed without hearing insurance company.
4. In view of above, this writ petition is disposed of with liberty aforesaid and further observation that in case any such application is filed, no order can be passed without hearing respondent-insurance company. September 30, 2026 N. Sinha Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Kusum Lata, Udai Pratap Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Vipul Kumar (Saurabh Shyam Shamshery,J.) Ram Narayan Rajbhar And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- NIRMAL SINHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad