- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:10596 CRP No. 67 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 20TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO. 67 OF 2026 BETWEEN: NANDAVARA JUMMA MASJID (WAKF) SAJIPA MANNUR VILLAGE, PANEMANGALORE HOBLI AND POST, BANTWAL TALUK-574 231. DAKSHIN KANNADA DISTRICT RE. BY ITS SECRETARY MR. MOHAMMED ARIF …PETITIONER (BY SRI HASAN MAGADI, FOR SRI. NAVEED AHMED, ADVOCATES) AND: 1. RUKAMINI W/O LATE BABUYAN LINGAPPA GOWDA AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS 2. SATISH S/O BABUYAN LINGAPPA GOWDA AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS 3. JAYASHRI D/O BABUYAN LINGAPPA GOWDA AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS 4. SHOBHA D/O BABUYAN LINGAPPA GOWDA AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS Digitally signed by JUANITA THEJESWINI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:10596 CRP No. 67 of 2026 5. REKHA D/O BABUYAN LINGAPPA GOWDA AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS 6. KUSHALAVATHI D/O BABUYAN LINGAPPA GOWDA AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS 7. SANTOSH S/O BABUYAN LINGAPPA GOWDA AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS RESPONDENTS 1 TO 7 ARE R/AT NANDAVARA VILLAGE, SAJIPA MANNUR PANEMANGALORE (HOBLI)- 574 231 BANTWAL TALUK DAKSHINA KANNADA DISTRICT 8. THE KARNATAKA STATE BOARD OF WAKF, CUNNINGHAM ROAD BENGALURU – 560 052. REP. BY ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, 9. THE INQUIRY OFFICER, KARNATAKA STATE BOARD OF WAKF, NO.6, CUNNINGHAM ROAD, BENGALURU – 560 001. …RESPONDENTS THIS CRP IS FILED U/S. 83(9) OF THE WAKF ACT, R/W SEC. 115 OF CPC PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED ORDER NO.4 DATED 27.12.2023 PASSED BY THE PRESIDING OFFICER, KARNATAKA WAKF TRIBUNAL, MYSORE IN OS.NO.2/22 AT ANNEXURE G AND CONSEQUENTLY ALLOW THE APPLICATION U/O 7 RULE 11 OF CPC AT ANNEXURE-E IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:10596 CRP No. 67 of 2026 ORAL ORDER The learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo dated 20.02.2026 seeking leave of this Court to withdraw the CRP in view of the amendment brought to the Wakf Act. 2. Learned counsel submits that in view of the amendment, the CRP is not maintainable. Therefore, learned counsel submits that the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw the CRP and file Miscellaneous First appeal in accordance with law. 3. The memo is taken on record subject to all its exceptions. 4. Accordingly, the CRP stands dismissed as withdrawn while reserving liberty to the petitioner as prayed for. The certified copy of the impugned order shall be returned to the petitioner. Sd/- (R DEVDAS) JUDGE PB List No.: 1 Sl No.: 30