Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 11686 (RAJ)

LAXMI AUTO ELECTRIC WORKS v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMP/7296/2026 · 2026-08-10

Kuldeep Mathur

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:38247] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 7296/2026 CNR: RJHC010814232026 | URN: CRLMP / 12610U / 2026 Laxmi Auto Electric Works, Its Through Proprietor Lal Chand S/o Chiman Lal Age 45 Years Resident Of Near Dali Bai Circle Jaisalmer Highway Opposite India Green Jodhpur District Jodhpur Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Secretary Department Of Finance Jaipur Rajasthan 2. The IndusInd Bank, Through Its Managing Director And General Manager Head Office One World Centre West Mumbai 400013 3. The IndusInd Bank, Through Branch Manager Boranada Gr Flr At Shop No S9 S10 Riico Housing Col Balotra Rd Boranada District Jodhpur Rajasthan 4. The Dig Cyber Crime, Police Head Quarters Jaipur Rajasthan ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr S.R. Godara For Respondent(s) : Mr. Narendra Gehlot, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP MATHUR Order 10/08/2026 1. The instant criminal misc. petition under Section 528 BNSS has been filed by the petitioner seeking the following reliefs:- “ i. It is, therefore most humbly and respectfully prayed that in the light of the above-mentioned facts and circumstances, it is therefore most respectfully and humbly prayed that by an appropriate writ order or direction:- ii. The act of the respondent by which they have freezed the bank account no. 259829176335 in Induslnd Bank at branch Boranada District Jodhpur, Raj. of the petitioner May be quashed and set aside and respondent Bank may [2026:RJ-JP:38247] (2 of 3) [CRLMP-7296/2026] be directed to defreeze the bank account of the petitioner and permit him to operate the bank account. iii. By an appropriate misc., order or direction, the respondents may kindly be directed to pay the 10% interest per annum on the amount in petitioner account which has been put on freeze from the date of the freeze till the date of release. iv. Any other appropriate order or direction which this Hon'ble Court deems just and proper in the peculiar facts and circumstances of this case may be passed in favour of the petitioner.” 2. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to dispose of this criminal misc. petition with a direction to the IndusInd Bank (Respondents No.2 & 3) to keep the disputed amount (the amount which was transferred illegally in the bank account of the petitioner) frozen and allow the petitioner to make transactions from his/its bank account from the remaining balance. 3. It is further made clear that in case, the respondent – Bank has not received the information regarding the exact figure of the disputed amount, which the Investigating Officer/Police alleges to be receipt(s) of the offence, the bank shall send a communication to the concerned Investigating Officer/Police, to indicate the amount to be earmarked for lien, while endorsing a copy of the instant order. 4. Upon receipt of such communication/letter, the concerned Investigating Officer/Police shall be under an obligation to apprise the respondent - Bank about the amount to be kept in lien, within a period of seven days of receiving the communication from the respondent - Bank. The respondent – bank shall thereafter do the needful as directed herein above. 5. It is further made clear that in case, the respondent-Bank does not receive any reply from the concerned Investigating [2026:RJ-JP:38247] (3 of 3) [CRLMP-7296/2026] Officer/Police, then it shall be duty bound to act in accordance with the instant order. 6. With the aforesaid directions, the instant criminal misc. petition is disposed of. 7. Stay petition as well as all pending application, if any, stand disposed of. (KULDEEP MATHUR),J 278/Himanshu Singh