Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 11683 (PAT)

Nilambar Yadav @ Lilamber Kumar Yadav @ Lilambar Kumar v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./12173/2026 · 2026-02-24

Prabhat Kumar Singh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.12173 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-377 Year-2024 Thana- BABUBARHI District- Madhubani ====================================================== 1. Nilambar Yadav @ Lilamber Kumar Yadav @ Lilambar Kumar S/o Ganesh Yadav @ Ramganesh Yadav R/o vill - Aurahi, ward no. 1, P.S.- Bhatchaura, P.s.- Babubarhi, Distt.- Madhubani 2. Chandan Yadav @ Chandan Kumar Yadav S/o Ganesh Yadav @ Ram Ganesh Yadav R/o vill - Aurahi, ward no. 1, P.S.- Bhatchaura, P.s.- Babubarhi, Distt.- Madhubani ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Ms.Kumari Pallavi For the Opposite Party/s : Dr. Ajeet Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 2 24-02-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offence under Sections 329(4), 75, 76, 126, 115(2), 303(2), 351(2), 3(5) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita. 3. As per F.I.R., on 20.08.2024 at about 11:00 PM, these two petitioners climbed the wall and entered the house of informant and thereafter, tried to commit rape with her and when informant protested, these petitioners and other co- accused persons assaulted her. It is further alleged that co- accused Kumari Devi and Sarita Devi snatched Mangalsutra & silver ornaments from the informant. Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.12173 of 2026(2) dt.24-02-2026 2/2 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners and informant are close door neighbours and due to dispute over pathway/passage, altercation took place. Injuries, sustained by informant, are simple in nature. Rest of the allegation are ornamental in order to make the case grave. Petitioners claim clean antecedent. 5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has opposed the bail petition. 6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the above named petitioners, in the event of their arrest/surrender within a period of eight weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned J.M. 1st Class, Madhubani in connection with Babubarhi P.S. Case No. 377 of 2024, subject to condition as laid down under Section 482 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. anay (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) U T