ABDUL HAFIZ @ MUNMUN v. MOHD. SALAUDDIN AND ANOTHER
A227/1679/2016 · 2026-09-29
Rohit Ranjan Agarwal
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 11676 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 11676 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 1679 of 2016 Court No. - 9 HON'BLE ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL, J.
1. Sri Arvind Srivastava, learned counsel for petitioner fairly states that his client is not responding in the matter. According to him, execution case might have been decided by now.
2. In view of the said fact, writ petition stands dismissed for want of instructions. September 30, 2026 SK Goswami Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Arvind Srivastava, Pushkar Srivastava Counsel for Respondent(s) : Atul Dayal(Senior Adv.), Rajesh Kumar Dubey (Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.) Abdul Hafiz @ Munmun .....Petitioner(s) Mohd. Salauddin And Another .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SHIVAKANT GOSWAMI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad