Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 11670 (AP)

M/s Kotaiah Agencies v. Peeyush Kumar, IAS

CC/730/2026 · 2026-09-29

Harinath N

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010071752026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] WEDNESDAY, THE 30th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N CONTEMPT CASE NO: 730/2026 Between: 1. M/S KOTAIAH AGENCIES,, FLT NO 105 BLOCK 5. PANCHAVATI APARTMENTS, AMMAVARI TEMPLE, PONNURU ROAD, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT-522003. REP BY ITS SOLE PROPRIETOR, MALAPATI GURU KRISHNA VARA PRASAD, S/O VENKAIAH, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, R/OFLTNO 105 BLOCK 5. PANCHAVATI APARTMENTS, AMMAVARI TEMPLE, PONNURU ROAD, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT-522003. ...PETITIONER AND 1. PEEYUSH KUMAR IAS, S/O NOT KNOWN TO THIS PETITIONER. PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, FINANCE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, 522237 GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. MAYUR ASHOK IAS, S/O NOT KNOWN TO THIS PETITIONER COMMISSIONER OF GUNTUR MUNICIPAL CORPORATION. MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OFFICE. OPPOSITE GANDHI PARK, GUNTUR 522003. ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to may be pleased to punish the Respondents herein under Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, for willful disobedience of order of this Honble Court dated. 10-09-2025 passed in W.P.No. 24127 of 2025, and pass such Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. SASANKA BHUVANAGIRI Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. RAMA RAO KOCHIRI 2. VANKAYALAPATI N PRAVEEN FOR RESPONDENT No.2 The Court made the following: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N CONTEMPT CASE No.730 OF 2026 ORDER: 1. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the order passed by this Court in W.P.No.24127 of 2025, dated 10.09.2025 has been complied with and as such no further orders are necessary in this Contempt Case. 2. In view of the above submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, nothing would further survive for co.00nsideration in this contempt case. 3. Recording the same, the present Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N Date: 30.09.2026 KGM 21 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N CONTEMPT CASE No.730 of 2026 Date: 30.09.2026 KGM