Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 11670 (ALL)

RAJMANI v. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 6 OTHERS

WRIA/6465/2026 · 2026-09-29

Manish Kumar Nigam

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 6465 of 2026 Court No. - 33 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J. 1. It has been contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that salary of the petitioner w.e.f. 15.11.2023 to 15.12.2023 has not been paid by the respondent authorities as well as he is seeking benefits of third A.C.P. 2. Learned Standing Counsel has submitted that petitioner may file a representation for redressal of his grievances before respondent authorities. 3. In case any such representation is filed by the petitioner within a period of one week, the same shall be considered and decided by respondent authority in accordance with law, after providing opportunity of hearing to all the concerned parties, expeditiously, preferably within a period of twelve weeks thereafter. 4. Accordingly, the petition stands disposed of. September 30, 2026 Kumar Manish Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Munna Yadav, Rajesh Nath Tripathi Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Rajmani .....Petitioner(s) State Of Uttar Pradesh And 6 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- MANISH TRIPATHI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad