Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 11668 (ALL)

HIMENDRA KUMAR v. STATE OF U.P. AND 10 OTHERS

WRIC/38504/2026 · 2026-09-29

Ajit Kumar, Garima Prashad

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 38504 of 2026 Court No. - 1 HON'BLE AJIT KUMAR, J. HON'BLE GARIMA PRASHAD, J. Heard Sri A.K.Maurya, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Sri Rakesh Pathak, learned counsel for the respondent. By means of this petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution, petitioner has prayed for following relief as substantial relief: "i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing the respondent authority to grant no objection certificate for development of New Retail Outlet (MS/HSD Filling Station) at plot /Gata No. 12 Village Mahuwa Bujurg (on Mahuwa Bujurga to Mishrauliya Piraila Road), District Siddharth Nagar, Uttar Pradesh under ST category Advertised on 28th June, 2023, in favour of the Indian Oil Corporation as well as petition." Learned Standing Counsel submits that he has no objection in the event this petition stands disposed of with a direction to the respondent no. 2 to look into and consider the grievance of the petitioner and pass appropriate order strictly in accordance with law. In view of the above, this petition stands disposed of with a direction that respondent no. 2 to consider the grievance of the petitioner and decide the same within a period of two months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order, in accordance with law. September 30, 2026 Sanjeev Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Arvind Kumar Maurya Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Rakesh Pathak (Garima Prashad,J.) (Ajit Kumar,J.) Himendra Kumar .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 10 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SANJEEV RANJAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad