Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 11659 (HP)

SUSHAMA DEVI v. THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS

EX.P./492/2026 · 2026-06-15

Jiya Lal Bhardwaj

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Execution Petition No.492 of 2026 Decided on: 15.06.2026 Uploaded on: 15.06.2026 ____________________________________________________________ Sushama Devi ...Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others ...Respondents _____________________________________________________________ Coram Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jiya Lal Bhardwaj, Judge Whether approved for reporting? 1 For the petitioner: Mr. Vikas Rajput, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Amandeep Sharma, Additional Advocate General. Jiya Lal Bhardwaj , Judge (Oral) Learned Additional Advocate General has produced a communication dated 25.04.2026 issued by Director, Directorate of School Education, Himachal Pradesh, Lalpani Shimla-1, and a copy of letter dated 23.03.2026 along with office order dated 06.12.2025, passed by Deputy Director of School Education (Elem) Bilaspur, District Bilaspur (HP). The same are taken on record. 2. A perusal of the office order dated 06.12.2025 reveals that the petitioner has been held entitled for the pay scale of ₹5480-8925/- from her initial date of appointment 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 along with all consequential benefits. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that though the office order dated 06.12.2025 has been passed but the terminal benefits therefrom have not been released in favour of the petitioner. 4. Since the mandate contained in the judgment dated 30.08.2025, passed in CWP No.13982 of 2025, titled, Sushama Devi vs. State of Himachal Pradesh & Ors., has been complied with, nothing remains to be adjudicated in the present petition and the same is closed. However, it is made clear that in case the consequential benefits are not released in favour of the petitioner, within eight weeks from today, in terms of the directions given by this Court in aforementioned judgment, the petitioner shall be at liberty to file an application for revival of the execution petition. 5. Accordingly, the execution petition is disposed of. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, also stand disposed of. 15 th June , 2026 ( Jiya Lal Bhardwaj ) (Anurag) Judge