RAM BADAI AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. AND 12 OTHERS
WRIC/29508/2026 · 2026-09-29
Satya Veer Singh
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 11659 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 11659 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 29508 of 2026 Court No. - 37 HON'BLE SATYA VEER SINGH, J.
1. Heard Mr. Rajesh Kumar Patel, learned counsel for the petitioners, Mr. Nand Lal Maurya, learned Standing Counsel for the State and Mr. Sudhir Bharti, learned counsel for respondent no.13 (Gram Sabha).
2. Learned counsel for the petitioners has stated that Partition Suit No.12106 of 2024 (Computerized Case No.T202405200112106) filed by petitioners was dismissed on 5th June, 2025 for want of prosecution. Against order dated 5th June, 2025 recall/restoration application was filed on 17th January, 2026 which is still pending.
3. Learned Standing Counsel as well as Mr. Bharti submitted that no useful purpose will be served by keeping this writ petition pending and a suitable direction may be issued.
4. The Additional Sub Divisional Officer, Tehsil Deoria, District Deoria is directed to decide the recall/restoration application dated 17th January, 2026 filed in Partition Suit No.12106 of 2024, Computerized Case No.T202405200112106 (Ram Badai and another Vs. Ram Chandra and others) within a period of three months from the date of receipt of this order by offering proper opportunity of hearing to concerned parties.
5. With the above observation, the writ petition is disposed of. September 30, 2026 Kpy Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ashutosh Kumar Gautam, Rajesh Kumar Patel Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Sudhir Bharti (Satya Veer Singh,J.) Ram Badai And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 12 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- KAVLESHWAR PRASAD YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad