Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 11658 (BOM)

CHETAN S/O PURUSHOTTAM TURANKAR v. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR PSO., PS WANI, DIST. YAVATMAL AND ANR

APPP/2850/2026 · 2026-09-24

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 36 BA 1136.26 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR CRIMINAL APPLICATION (BA) NO. 1136/2026 (Chetan S/o Purushottam Turankar Vs. State of Maharashtra & anr.) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Mr. S. M. Lodha, Advocate for applicant. Mr. H.R. Dhumale, APP for non-applicant/State. Ms. Kajal Bhagwat, Advocate for non-applicant No.2.(appointed) CORAM: M. M. NERLIKAR, J . DATED : 24/09/2026. Heard. 2. After hearing for some time, when this Court is not inclined to grant bail, the learned counsel for the applicant seeks permission to withdraw the present application with liberty to file fresh bail application before the Trial Court, in case the trial is not concluded within one year. 4. Permission granted. 5. Application stands disposed of as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. 6. Pending application(s), if any, stands disposed of accordingly. 7. Fees for the appointed counsel be paid as per Rules. ( M. M. NERLIKAR , J.) Gohane Signed by: Mr. J. B. Gohane Designation: PS To Honourable Judge Date: 28/09/2026 20:40:27