HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 3081 of 2026 Court No. - 71 HON'BLE RAJIV LOCHAN SHUKLA, J. 1. Heard, the Learned counsel for the applicant, the Learned counsel for the informant and the Learned A.G.A. for the State. 2. This Court on 15.04.2026 passed the following order:- "1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State as well as learned counsel for the informant and perused the material brought on record. 2. The present application has been moved seeking anticipatory bail in Case Crime No. 358 of 2025, under Sections 115(2), 316(2), 109, 352, 351(3), 324(4) of B.N.S., Police Station Dankaur, District Gautam Buddha Nagar, with the prayer that in the event of arrest, applicant may be released on anticipatory bail. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that in the F.I.R. the main allegation is against co-accused, Rajesh Sharma for cheating the informant. Now the said co-accused, Rajesh Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Abhishek Kumar Shukla, Dinesh Kumar Tiwari, Shrawan Kumar Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Rakesh Kumar Srivastava Sunil .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) Sharma, has given entire due amount today to the learned counsel for the informant and his interim bail has been extended, therefore, applicant may also be granted interim anticipatory bail. In the matter till date charge sheet has not been filed and the investigation is going on. The applicant is innocent and he has an apprehension that he may be arrested in the above-mentioned case, whereas there is no credible evidence against him. It has further been submitted that applicant has no criminal antecedents and that no coercive process has been issued against the applicant so far. It was also submitted that applicant undertakes to cooperate during investigation and trial and he would appear as and when required by the investigating agency or Court. It has been stated that in case, the applicant is granted anticipatory bail, he shall not misuse the liberty of bail and will cooperate with the investigation and would obey all conditions of bail. 4. Learned A.G.A. as well as learned counsel for the informant have opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail, but they could not dispute that the entire due amount has been given to the informant by the main accused, Rajesh Sharma. 5. Having considered the rival submissions advanced by the learned counsel for the parties and considering the fact that the entire due amount has been given to the informant by the main accused, it is provided that till the next date of listing, the applicant- Sunil, is granted interim anticipatory bail in the aforesaid case crime, on furnishing a personal bond with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the NABAIL No. 3081 of 2026 2 court concerned with the following conditions:- (i) The applicant shall attend the court proceedings as and when required. (ii) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise or to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. (iii) The applicant shall not leave India without the previous permission of the court. 6. In case of breach of any of the above conditions, the prosecution shall be at liberty to move an application for cancellation of interim anticipatory bail before this Court. 7. List on 27.05.2026." 3. Then, on 03.08.2026, the following order has been passed:- "1. The Learned counsel for the applicant submits that pursuant to the earlier order of this Court, further amount of Rs.2,15,000/- has been deposited by the applicant. 2. The Learned counsel for the informant prays for a short time to verify the said facts. 3. Time, so sought, is granted. 4. List on 11.08.2026. 5. Till 11.08.2026, interim order, granted earlier, is extended." 4. Today, when the case has been called on, The Learned counsels for the parties, relying upon the order passed in the NABAIL No. 3081 of 2026 3 connected application i.e. CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 3041 of 2026 today, have stated that no dispute now remains as the money due till date has been paid to the informant. 5. The Learned counsel for the informant does not oppose the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail. 6. In the view of the Court, it would be appropriate to dispose of this application after confirming the interim order that had been granted in favour of the applicant. 7. In view of the above, the interim anticipatory bail granted to the applicant by the previous order of this Court dated 15.04.2026 is hereby confirmed. 9. The anticipatory bail application of the applicant is allowed. 10. In the event of the arrest of the applicant- Sunil, he shall be released forthwith in the Case Crime No. 358 of 2025, under Sections 115(2), 316(2), 109, 352, 351(3), 324(4) of B.N.S., Police Station Dankaur, District Gautam Buddha Nagar, on anticipatory bail on the same terms and conditions as provided in the order dated 15.04.2026. September 30, 2026 Sachin NABAIL No. 3081 of 2026 4 (Rajiv Lochan Shukla,J.) Digitally signed by :- SACHIN TIWARI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad