PRAMOD KUMAR v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND THROUGH DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, BOKARO
C.M.P./62/2026 · 2026-02-03
Rajesh Kumar
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 11654 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 11654 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2026:JHHC:2771
1 C.M.P No.62 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI C.M.P. No. 62 of 2026
1. Pramod Kumar, aged about 48 years, s/o Late Ram Nath Singh
2. Nibha Kumari, aged about 45 years, W/o Pramod Kumar Both are residents of House No. 190- A, near Joda Mandir, Rana Pratap Nagar, Chas, P.O. & P.S. Chas, District Bokaro, Jharkhand. …....... Intervenor/Petitioner(s)
Vrs.
1. The State of Jharkhand through Deputy Commissioner, Bokaro at camp 2, Bokaro, P.O. & P.S. B.S. City, District-Bokaro, Jharkhand.
2. The Divisional Forest Officer, Court Area, Sector-1, Bokaro Steel City, P.O. & P.S.- Sector-4, Bokaro, Jharkhand. ……..... Judgment Debtor/Opposite Parties
3. Baldev Mahatha, S/O Late Kedar Nath Mahatha 4 Ram Kinkar Mahatha S/O Late Bholanath Mahatha 5 Upendra Nath Mahatha 6.Rajendra Kumar Mahatha Both Sons of Late Bhajhari Mahatha 7.Ashwini Kumar Mahatha, S/O Late Ayadhaya Nath Mahatha
All R/O Village-Kamaldih, P.O. & P.S. Pindrajora, District-Bokaro, Jharkhand
.......... Decree Holders/Opposite Party(s)
…....
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR
For the Petitioner
: Mrs. Vandana Singh, Advocate For the O.P.
: Ms. Deepika Jojowar, A.C to SC-VI
Mr. Piyush Anand, AC to SC-VI
03/03.02.2026 The present C.M.P. has been filed for the following relief(s):
“i. For quashing and setting aside of the order dated 21.11.2025 passed by the Court of Sri Abhinandan Pandey, learned Civil Judge (Jr. Div.), Bokaro in Execution Case No. 02 of 2023 contained in Annexure-5 to this civil miscellaneous petition by which the learned court below has rejected the application filed by the petitioners for adjudication of claim of right, title, interest of petitioners/intervenors/purchaser in interest on the part and parcel of land decreed by the court on the fraudulent and collusive pleadings of the decree holder. AND ii. During the pendency of the instant Civil Miscellaneous Petition, further proceedings of Execution Case No. 02/2023 be stayed.”
2. After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks
2026:JHHC:2771
2 C.M.P No.62 of 2026 permission to withdraw the petition with a liberty to the petitioner to work out his remedy in accordance with law as provided under the Code of Civil Procedure.
3.
Learned counsel for the opposite party is present and has not raised any objection.
4. Accordingly, the present C.M.P. stands disposed of as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty.
(Rajesh Kumar, J.) 03.02.2026 A. Mohanty Uploaded
____/____/2026