[2026:RJ-JP:38271] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 7294/2026 CNR: RJHC010814212026 | URN: CRLMP / 12608U / 2026 Vijendra Bairwa S/o Ramavtar Bairwa, Aged About 22 Years, R/o C/o Ramavtar Bairwa, Nangal Rajawatan, Tehsil Lalsot, District Dausa, Rajasthan - 303505. Currently Resident Of Street No. 9, R.k. Colony, Nimbahera, District Chittorgarh, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor. 2. State Bank Of India, Through Its Branch Manager, State Bank Of India,nangal Rajawatan Branch, Tehsil Lalsot, District Dausa, Rajasthan-303505. 3. Deputy Inspector General Of Police, Cyber Crime, Police Headquarters,jaipur, Rajasthan ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Dilip Kumar For Respondent(s) : Mr. Narendra Gehlot, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP MATHUR Order 10/08/2026 1. The instant criminal misc. petition under Section 528 BNSS has been filed by the petitioner seeking the following reliefs:- “ It is therefore most respectfully prayed that this Criminal Misc. Petition may kindly be allowed and, by an appropriate writ, order or direction:- 1. The Respondents may be directed to expeditiously complete the investigation qua the petitioner, if any, and to allow the petitioner to operate his bank account on a provisional basis, without any interruption, pending such investigation. 2. The petitioner holds Savings Bank Account No. 61283683341, Customer Name: Vijendra Bairwa, with the Respondent State Bank of India, Nangal Rajawatan Branch (ANNEXURE-2). The Respondents may kindly be directed to remove the debit freeze/block on the said account and to unfreeze the same. 3. The petitioner may kindly be permitted to operate his account and to use the amount lawfully deposited by him [2026:RJ-JP:38271] (2 of 3) [CRLMP-7294/2026] therein. 4. Any other appropriate order which this Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case may also kindly be passed in favour of the petitioner.” 2. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to dispose of this criminal misc. petition with a direction to the State Bank Of India (Respondent No.2) to keep the disputed amount (the amount which was transferred illegally in the bank account of the petitioner) frozen and allow the petitioner to make transactions from his bank account from the remaining balance. 3. It is further made clear that in case, the respondent – Bank has not received the information regarding the exact figure of the disputed amount, which the Investigating Officer/Police alleges to be receipt(s) of the offence, the bank shall send a communication to the concerned Investigating Officer/Police, to indicate the amount to be earmarked for lien, while endorsing a copy of the instant order. 4. Upon receipt of such communication/letter, the concerned Investigating Officer/Police shall be under an obligation to apprise the respondent - Bank about the amount to be kept in lien, within a period of seven days of receiving the communication from the respondent - Bank. The respondent – bank shall thereafter do the needful as directed herein above. 5. It is further made clear that in case, the respondent-Bank does not receive any reply from the concerned Investigating Officer/Police, then it shall be duty bound to act in accordance with the instant order. [2026:RJ-JP:38271] (3 of 3) [CRLMP-7294/2026] 6. With the aforesaid directions, the instant criminal misc. petition is disposed of. 7. Stay petition as well as all pending application, if any, stand disposed of. (KULDEEP MATHUR),J 276/Himanshu Singh