Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 11652 (AP)

ANDIBOYANA VENKATA RAMANA v. STATE OF AP

WP/25628/2020 · 2026-09-22

Harinath N

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 APHC010383892020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] WEDNESDAY, THE 23rd DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 25628/2020 Between: 1. ANDIBOYANA VENKATA RAMANA, S/O SIMHACHALAM, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, OCCP.- DIRECTOR , THE PEDA GANTYADA DISPLACED PERSONS HORTICULTURAL SERVICE COOPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD., NO. 574/95, PEDA GANTYADA, PEDA GANTYADA MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT 2. KINTADA SANYASI RAO, S/O NAGA RAJU, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, OCCP.- DIRECTOR , THE PEDA GANTYADA DISPLACED PERSONS HORTICULTURAL SERVICE COOPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD., NO. 574/95, PEDA GANTYADA, PEDA GANTYADA MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT RESIDENT AT NADUPURU, PEDA GANTYADA MANDAL, VISAKHAPANTAM ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. STATE OF AP, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HORTICULTURE, A.P. SECRETARIAT, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE REGISTRAR OF COOPERATIVE SOCIETIESHORTICULTURE AND COMMISSIONER OF HORTICULTURE, GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT, 3. THE COMMISSIONER FOR COOPERATION AND REGISTRAR OF COOPERATIVE SOCIETIES, GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT . 4. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR COOPERATION, VISAKHAPATNAM, 2 VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 5. THE ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF HORTICULTURE VISAKHAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT 6. THE PEDA GANTYADA DISPLACED PERSONS HORTICULTURAL SERVICE COOPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD, NO. 574/95, PEDA GANTYADA MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus to declare the action of the 2nd respondent in issuing Proceedings No. ITDM and Publicity / 10-2014 dated 09-11-2020 for dissolution, winding up and cancellation of the 6th respondent Society under section 64 and 68 of the of APCS Act 1964 as illegal, arbitrary and Un Constitutional and contrary of the provisions of A.P. Cooperative societies act and rules made there under and consequently set aside the Proceedings No. ITDM and Publicity / 10/2014 dated 09-11-2020 issued by the 2nd respondent and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2020 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the Proceedings No. ITDM & Publicity/10/2014 dated 09-11-2020 issued the 2nd respondent under section 64 and 68 of the of APCS Act 1964 for dissolution, winding up and Cancellation of the 6th respondent Society pending disposal of the Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. L V S NAGARAJU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. 3 The Court made the following ORDER: Learned counsel for the petitioners sought permission of this Court to withdraw the present writ petition. Permission is accorded. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N Date:23.09.2026 RSD 4 2 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 25628 of 2020 Date: 23.09.2026 RSD