M/S SAI SUMUKHA PROPERTIES v. THE CHIEF COMMISSIONER
WP/5014/2026 · 2026-04-01
M I Arun
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 11649 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 11649 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:17823 WP No. 5014 of 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 1ST DAY OF APRIL, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.I.ARUN WRIT PETITION NO. 5014 OF 2026 (LB-BMP)
BETWEEN:
1.
M/S SAI SUMUKHA PROPERTIES A PARTNERSHIP FIRM REGISTERED UNDER THE REGISTRAR OF FIRMS REGISTRATION DISTRICT OFFICE AT NO. 37, TELECOM LAYOUT TIMBER LAYOUT, MYSORE ROAD BANGALORE-560 026.
REP. BY ITS PARTNER SRI. L.K.MANI S/O LATE L.KRISHNAIAH SETTY AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS R/AT NO.1414, "SRITA" TWENTY THIRD MAIN ROAD BANASHANKARI SECOND STAGE BENGALURU-560 070. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. AKASH V.T., ADVOCATE) AND:
1.
THE CHIEF COMMISSIONER GREATER BENGALURU AUTHORITY N.R.SQUARE, BENGALURU
Digitally signed by GEETHA P G Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:17823 WP No. 5014 of 2026
BANGALORE-560 002.
2.
ZONAL COMMISSIONER VIJAYANAGARA ZONE BRUHAT BANGALORE MAHANAGARAPALIKE BANGALORE-560 040.
3.
ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER GALI ANJANEYASWAMI TEMPLE SUB - DIVISION, BASAVESHWARA LAYOUT 3RD MAIN ROAD, BEHIND KAILASHESHWARA TEMPLE ATTIGUPPE, BENGALURU-560 040. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. PAWAN KUMAR, ADVOCATE)
THIS PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT OF CERTIORARI QUASHING THE PROVISIONAL ORDER DATED 17.09.2024 BEARING NO.A.E.E./GA/PO/02/24-25 UNDER SECTION 248(1) OF B.B.M.P ACT, ISSUED BY RESPONDENT NO.3 AT ANNEXURE-A AND ETC.
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THROUGH PHYSICAL HEARING/VIDEO CONFERENCING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.I.ARUN
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:17823 WP No. 5014 of 2026
ORAL ORDER
1. The present writ petition is filed challenging two provisional orders and one confirmation order passed by respondents-Bruhat Bengaluru Mahanagara Palike (BBMP)/Greater Bengaluru Authority (GBA) against the construction put up by the petitioner.
2.
Learned counsel for the respondents-BBMP/GBA submits that the same impugned orders are challenged by filing appeals under Section 250 of the Greater Bengaluru Governance Act, 2024 and Appeal nos.11/2026, 17/2026 and 18/2026 are pending before the Chief Commissioner (respondent no.1).
3. As the petitioner is having an alternative and efficacious remedy and he has also availed the same, the petition stands dismissed. However, respondents are
directed not to initiate any coercive action against the petitioner till an appropriate decision is taken by
- 4 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:17823 WP No. 5014 of 2026
respondent no.1 in the appeals said to be pending before it.
Pending I.As., if any, stand disposed of.
Sd/- (M.I.ARUN) JUDGE
PGG List No.: 1 Sl No.: 58