( 2026:HHC:22048 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA Contempt Petition No.604 of 2026 Date of decision: 15.06.2026 Chunni Lal ….Petitioner Versus Rakesh Kanwar & another. ….Respondents Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja, J. Whether approved for reporting ?1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Santosh Kumar, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional Advocate General. Sushil Kukreja, Judge(Oral): Learned Additional Advocate General, has placed on record Office Order dated 12.06.2026, wherein, it has been stated that the petitioner (who is initially appointed as TGT on contract basis) in above said COPC/CWP, is allowed higher pay scale of Rs.41,600/- after two years of regular service subject to final outcome of LPA filed in CWP No.4830/2023, titled as Inder Singh and any other legal remedies. 2. Therefore, in view of the above, no further order is required to be passed in the present contempt petition and accordingly, the same is closed and disposed of. However, the petitioner is at liberty to assail the aforesaid order dated 12.06.2026, in accordance with law, if he still remains aggrieved. ( Sushil Kukreja ) Judge June 15, 2026 (reena) 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgement? 2