M/S MAHAPAVANA HOMES INDIA PVT LTD v. SRI K GANGAPPA
CMP/567/2025 · 2026-02-26
Ashok S Kinagi
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 11645 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 11645 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:12285 CMP No. 567 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 26TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI CIVIL MISC. PETITION NO. 567 OF 2025 BETWEEN:
M/S MAHAPAVANA HOMES INDIA PVT. LTD., A COMPANY INCORPORATED UNDER THE PROVISION OF COMPANIES ACT-1956, HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT, NO. 6 AND 7, 1ST FLOOR, KHATA NO. 3660/10, M.A. PRAKASH LAYOUT, SCOUT CAMP ROAD, NEAR RAILWAY STATION, DODDABALLAPURA TOWN, DODDABALLAPURA TALUK, BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT- 561203 REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR SRI.M. MALLESH …PETITIONER (BY SRI. ANANDA H C., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
SRI K GANGAPPA S/O. K.SHIVARAMAIHA
Digitally signed by SUNITHA K S Location:
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:12285 CMP No. 567 of 2025
AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS R/AT- NO.24, PUTTAPANA COMPOUND, 3RD MAIN, 4TH CROSS, ASHWATHNAGARA, SANJAYA NAGARA POST, BANAGLORE-94.
2.
SRI. PANDIT HARISH S/O. LATE. PANDIT SHIVARAMAKRISHNAIHA AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS R/AT- TEMPLE STREET, PAMUR VILLAGE AND MANDAL AND POST PRAKASHAM DISTRICT -52310
3.
SRI. GADDAM VENKATANARAYANAREDDY S/O. ALLURALAH AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS R/AT- SATHYANARAYANAPURAM PAMUR VILLAGE AND MANDAL AND POST PRAKASHAM DISTRICT – 523108
4.
SRI. POKA VENKATESHWARALU S/O. PEDDA CHALAMAIAH AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS R/AT-, SATHYANARAYANAPURAM PAMUR VILLAGE AND MANDAL AND POST PRAKASHAM DISTRICT - 523108
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:12285 CMP No. 567 of 2025
5.
SRI. AKUPATHI RAMANAIAHA S/O. LAKSHMAIAHA AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS R/AT- ANKALAMMA STREET, PAMUR VILLAGE AND MANDAL AND POST PRAKASHAM DISTRICT. PIN-523108. …RESPONDENTS
THIS CMP IS FILED UNDER SECTION 11(6) OF ARBITRATION AND CONCILIATION ACT, 1996, PRAYING TO APPOINT AN ARBITRATOR TO REDRESS THE EXISTING DISPUTE BETWEEN THE PETITIONERS AND RESPONDENT AS PER SEC.11(6) OF ARBITRATION AND CONCILIATION ACT 1996, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY AS PER CLAUSE 5 OF LIMITATION ACT OF MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING WHICH IS AT ANNEXURE - D, DATED
6.07.2020.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI
ORAL ORDER
The petition was filed on 25.09.2025. Office has raised objections. Despite granting sufficient opportunity, the petitioner did not comply with the office objections.
- 4 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:12285 CMP No. 567 of 2025
2. Today, the matter is listed for fifth time for compliance of office objections. Case called twice. None appears to the petitioner. It seems that the petitioner is not interested in complying with the office objections.
3. Accordingly, I proceed to pass the following
order:
ORDER The Civil Miscellaneous petition is dismissed for non-compliance of office objections.
Sd/- (ASHOK S.KINAGI) JUDGE
SKS CT:KHV