Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
CWP No. 9496 of 2026 Decided on: 15.06.2026 Uploaded on: 15.06.2026 Ramesh Lal … Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh … Respondent Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? ____________________________________________________
_
For the petitioner: Mr. Kul Bhushan Khajuria, Advocate. For the respondent: Mr. Rahul Thakur, Deputy Advocate General. Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral) In light of the fact that the petitioner has not yet completed normal tenure of three years at the present station, this Court is of the considered view that no direction can be issued for his adjustment, as prayed for and the petitioner may approach the Authority or the Court once he completes the normal tenure of three years at the said station. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand disposed of.
(Ajay Mohan Goel)
Judge June 15, 2026 (Rishi)