Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:38221] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 7278/2026 CNR: RJHC010813472026 | URN: CRLMP / 12588U / 2026 Dilip Bangra S/o Roopa Ram, Aged About 25 Years, Resident Of Bangdo Ka Mohalla, Sarnawara, District Nagaur, Rajasthan -
341504. ----Petitioner Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor.
2. Deputy Inspector Geneal, Cyber Crime, Police Head Quarters, Rajasthan.
3. State Bank Of India (12899), Through Its Branch Manager, Having Its Office At Near Bus Stand Chhoti Khatu, Rajasthan. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Pradeep Bhakar For Respondent(s) : Mr. Narendra Gehlot, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP MATHUR
Order 10/08/2026
1. The instant criminal misc. petition under Section 528 BNSS has been filed by the petitioner seeking the following reliefs:-
“(I) To direct the respondents to immediately lift the freeze/debit freeze imposed on the petitioner's saving bank account No. 41218359616 held with respondent No.3 State Bank Of India Branch At Bus Stand Chhoti Khatu, Nagaur, Rajasthan. II) To award the Petitioner adequate compensation for the financial losses suffered due to the arbitrary and unlawful freezing of his accounts. (III) Any other relief which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case, may also kindly be passed in favour of the Petitioner.”
2. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to dispose of this criminal misc. petition with a direction to the State Bank Of India
[2026:RJ-JP:38221] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-7278/2026] (Respondent No.3) to keep the disputed amount (the amount which was transferred illegally in the bank account of the petitioner) frozen and allow the petitioner to make transactions from his bank account from the remaining balance.
3. It is further made clear that in case, the respondent – Bank has not received the information regarding the exact figure of the disputed amount, which the Investigating Officer/Police alleges to be receipt(s) of the offence, the bank shall send a communication to the concerned Investigating Officer/Police, to indicate the amount to be earmarked for lien, while endorsing a copy of the instant order.
4. Upon receipt of such communication/letter, the concerned Investigating Officer/Police shall be under an obligation to apprise the respondent - Bank about the amount to be kept in lien, within a period of seven days of receiving the communication from the respondent - Bank. The respondent – bank shall thereafter do the needful as directed herein above.
5. It is further made clear that in case, the respondent-Bank does not receive any reply from the concerned Investigating Officer/Police, then it shall be duty bound to act in accordance with the instant order.
6. With the aforesaid directions, the instant criminal misc. petition is disposed of.
7. Stay petition as well as all pending application, if any, stand
disposed of.
(KULDEEP MATHUR),J 242/Sonia