1 ( 2026:HHC:22073 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA COPC No. 90 of 2026 Decided on: 15.06.2026 ________________________________________________ Tek Chand ....Petitioner Versus Rakesh Kanwar & Anr. …Respondents _ Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner : Dr. Rajesh Kumar Parmar, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Manoj Chauhan, Additional Advocate General. Sushil Kukreja, Judge (oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner stated that fresh representation of the petitioner has been considered and decided by the respondents-Department and the petitioner has been adjusted at GSSS Dugli, District Chamba, H.P. He further stated that in view of the aforesaid development, he does not want to pursue with the present contempt petition. 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 ( 2026:HHC:22073 ) 2. Consequently, the present contempt petition is dismissed, as not pressed. Pending application(s), if any, stands disposed of. ( Sushil Kukreja ) 15th June, 2026 Judge (raman)