Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 1164 (KAR)

RAMESH T V v. SRI ROSHAN JAYARAM

CRL.RP/1929/2025 · 2026-03-23

V Srishananda

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:16495 CRL.RP No. 1929 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF MARCH, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.1929 OF 2025 BETWEEN: RAMESH T V S/O LATE VEERABHADRAIAH SHETTY AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.128, SLS SPLENDOR, RMZ ECO SPACE ROAD, BELLANDUR, BENGALURU - 560 130 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. ANANDA V., ADVOCATE) AND: SRI ROSHAN JAYARAM S/O JAYARAM N, AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.B, 2102 PRESTIGE SUNRISE PARK, BIRCHWOOD NEOTOWN ROAD, ELECTRONIC CITY PHASE - 1, BENGALURU - 560 100 …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. RUPESH KUMAR S., ADVOCATE) THIS CRL.RP IS FILED U/S.397 R/W 401 CR.P.C (U/S 438 R/W 442 BNSS) BY THE ADVOCATE FOR THE PETITIONER PRAYING THAT THIS HONOURABLE COURT MAY BE PLEASED Digitally signed by R MANJUNATHA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:16495 CRL.RP No. 1929 of 2025 TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT DTD. 06.12.2025 PASSED IN CRL.A.NO.1662/2023 PASSED BY THE LXVIII ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE AT BENGALURU CITY WHICH CONFIRMED THE JUDGEMENT PASSED IN CC.NO.11382/2023 DTD. 27.06.2023 ON THE FILE OF XIX ADDL. CMM AT BENGALURU CITY AND ALLOW THIS R.P. AND DISMISS THE CC.11382/2023 FILED BY THE RESPONDENT ON THE FILE OF XIX ADDL. CMM AT BENGALURU CITY. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA ORAL ORDER 1. Parties are present and filed a joint memo which reads as under: The Petitioner and Respondent most respectfully submit as follows: 1. It is submitted that on the instruction of the well wishers, elders and friends, the Petitioner and Respondent has agreed to settle the dispute between them amicably as follows: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:16495 CRL.RP No. 1929 of 2025 2. The Respondent has filed the present case under the provisions of Negotiable instruments Act in CC No.11382/2022 before the XIX Addl. Chief metropolitan Magistrate at Bengaluru. After the judgment of conviction by imposing fine of Rs.1 crore, by the trial court, the Appellant has field criminal Appeal in 1662/2023 before the LXVII Addl. City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bengaluru City. The Appellate court has dismissed Appeal and confirmed the judgment passed by the trial court. Hence the Appellant is before this Hon'ble court by filing this Criminal Revision petition. 3. The Petitioner and Respondent has agreed to settle the dispute between them for the amount of Rs.20,00,000/- (Rupees Twenty Lakhs only) as full and final settlement. 4. The Petitioner has agreed to withdraw the amount of Rs. 20,00,000/- by the respondent which is already deposited before the XIX Addl. Chief metropolitan Magistrate at Bengaluru and the respondent has agreed for the same. 5. The Respondent has also agreed to withdraw the criminal Appeal filed challenging the judgment of passed in C.C.55297/2022 by the XIV ACMM, Benaluru. Which is pending before the City Civil and Sessions court, Bengaluru. 6. The petitioner and respondent hereby declare that this settlement has been entered into voluntarily and without any coercion, undue influence, or pressure from any - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:16495 CRL.RP No. 1929 of 2025 person whatsoever. Upon release of the deposited amount in favour of the Respondent, the parties confirm that this shall constitute full and final settlement of all disputes, claims, and liabilities arising out of the subject cheques and the transactions related thereto, and neither party shall have any further claims against the other in respect of the said matter. Therefore, it is prayed that this Hon'ble court may kindly be pleased to set aside the judgment passed in CC No.11382/2022 by the XIX Addl. by the XIX Addl. Chief metropolitan Magistrate at Bengaluru, in the interest of justice." 2. Contents of the joint memo read over to the parties. Parties have agreed that the terms of the joint memo depict true terms of settlement and there is no force, coercion or undue influence in reaching the terms of the joint memo. 3. Hence, placing the joint memo on record, petition stands disposed off. - 5 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:16495 CRL.RP No. 1929 of 2025 4. Amount in deposit is ordered to be withdrawn by the complainant under due identification. Sd/- (V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE snc List No.: 2 Sl No.: 1