HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 10221 of 2026 Court No. - 71 HON'BLE RAJIV LOCHAN SHUKLA, J. 1. At the very outset, the Learned A.G.A. has raised an objection that the offences alleged against the applicant is not punishable with imprisonment exceeding seven years. It is further submitted that the chargesheet has been filed and there is no apprehension of arrest of the applicant, therefore, the present application seeking anticipatory bail is not maintainable. 2. After some arguments, learned counsel for the applicant prays that the applicant may be permitted to approach the concerned Court and apply for regular bail, which may be directed to be decided in accordance with the law laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Satender Kumar Antil vs. Central Bureau of Investigation & Another, (2021) 10 SCC 773. He further prays that for a short time, the interest of the applicant may be protected as non bailable warrants have been issued against the applicant. 3. The Learned A.G.A. and Shri Vipin Chandra Pandey, Learned counsel for the informant have no objection to the said prayer. 4. Taking into account the submissions made by the learned counsel for the parties, it is directed that in case the applicant appears in Case Crime No.119 of 2026 under Sections 115(2), 352, 351(3), 110 B.N.S. Police Station-Ughaiti, District-Budaun, before the Court concerned within a Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Shivajee Srivastava, Surendra Nath Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Vipin Chandra Pandey Banvari .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) period of four weeks from today and applies for bail, his bail application shall be considered and disposed of expeditiously in accordance with law laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Satender Kumar Antil vs. Central Bureau of Investigation & Another, (2021) 10 SCC 773, and also subsequent orders of the Supreme Court in the aforementioned case, without being influenced by any observations made by the concerned Court while rejecting the anticipatory bail application of the applicant. 5. For a period of four weeks from today, the execution of non-bailable warrants issued against the applicant in the aforesaid case shall remain stayed. 5. With the aforesaid observations/directions, this application stands disposed of. September 30, 2026 A. Pandey NABAIL No. 10221 of 2026 2 (Rajiv Lochan Shukla,J.) Digitally signed by :- ANAND PANDEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad