Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 11631 (MAD)

Senthilkumar @ Kondaimeen @ Kumar v. State represented by, The Inspector of Police

CRL OP/9340/2026 · 2026-04-15

C Kumarappan

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Crl.O.P.No.9340 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 15.04.2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN Crl.O.P.No.9340 of 2026 Senthilkumar @ Kondaimeen @ Kumar ... Petitioner Vs. State represented by The Inspector of Police, Vaduvoor Police Station, Thiruvarur District. Crime No.46 of 2026 ... Respondent PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, Act, 2023, to enlarge the petitioner on bail in the event of his arrest by the respondent police in the above Cr.No.46 of 2026 on the file of the respondent. For Petitioner : Mr.Swami Subramanian For Respondent : Mr.P.Dhileepan Government Advocate (Crl.Side) ORDER The petitioner apprehends arrest for the alleged offence under Sections 294(b), 420 and 506(i) of IPC, 1860, in Crime No.46 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police seeks anticipatory bail. 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.9340 of 2026 2. The allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner under the pretext of securing job in New zealand had cheated the defacto complainant to the tune of Rs.3 lakhs. Hence, the case. 3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has been falsely implicated in this case. He further submitted that the petitioner is ready to abide by any stringent condition that may be imposed by this Court. Hence, he prays to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 4.The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent police reiterated the prosecution case and submitted that the petitioner has three previous cases. 5. Considering the bad antecedents of the petitioner having three previous cases , this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.9340 of 2026 6.Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. 15.04.2026 sma To 1. The Inspector of Police, Vaduvoor Police Station, Thiruvarur District. 2.The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras. 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.9340 of 2026 C.KUMARAPPAN.J. sma Crl.O.P.No.9340 of 2026 15.04.2026 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis