1 2026:CGHC:21084 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 3061 of 2022 1 - Smt. Parvati Parkhe W/o Uttam Rao Parkhe Aged About 82 Years R/o M- 12, Old Adarsh Nagar, Durg, District- Durg, Chhattisgarh 2 - Subhash Parkhe S/o Uttam Rao Parkhe Aged About 54 Years R/o M-12, Old Adarsh Nagar, Durg, District- Durg, Chhattisgarh 3 - Rajshree Parkhe W/o Subhash Parkhe Aged About 51 Years R/o M-12, Old Adarsh Nagar, Durg, District- Durg, Chhattisgarh 4 - Manoj Parkhe S/o Uttam Rao Parkhe Aged About 54 Years R/o M-12, Old Adarsh Nagar, Durg, District- Durg, Chhattisgarh 5 - Smt. Varsha Parkhe W/o Manoj Parkhe Aged About 47 Years R/o M-12, Old Adarsh Nagar, Durg, District- Durg, Chhattisgarh 6 - Harshala Parkhe D/o Manoj Parkhe Aged About 24 Years R/o M-12, Old Adarsh Nagar, Durg, District- Durg, Chhattisgarh 7 - Yamini Parkhe D/o Manoj Parkhe Aged About 20 Years R/o M-12, Old Adarsh Nagar, Durg, District- Durg, Chhattisgarh 8 - Mayank Parkhe S/o Subhash Parkhe Aged About 26 Years R/o M-12, Old Adarsh Nagar, Durg, District- Durg, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - Uttam Rao Parkhe S/o Sakharam Parkhe Aged About 87 Years R/o Ward No. 42, Old Adarsh Nagar, House No. 12, Post Office- Kasaridih, Tehsil And District- Durg, Chhattisgarh Digitally signed by SHAYNA KADRI 2 2 - Smt. Sulabha Rao Parkhe W/o Uttam Rao Parkhe Aged About 76 Years R/o Ward No. 42, Old Adarsh Nagar, House No. 12, Post Office- Kasaridih, Tehsil And District- Durg, Chhattisgarh 3 - Collector Cum Appellate Tribunal Durg, District Durg, Chhattisgarh 4 - Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue) Cum Maintenance Tribunal Durg, District Durg, Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) (Cause Title is taken from CIS System) For Petitioner : Ms. Mahi Pandey, Advocate holding brief on behalf of Mr. Anmol Sharma, Advocate For State : Dr. Arham Siddiqui, Panel Lawyer For Res. No. 1 and 2 : Mr. Leekesh Kumar, Advocate holding brief on behalf of Ms. Renu Kochar, Advocate Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 06/05/2026 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present petition on the ground that respondents No. 1 and 2 have already expired with liberty to file fresh petition, if any exigency arises. 2. In view of the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty as prayed for. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Shayna Judge