[2026:RJ-JP:36451] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 9039/2026 CNR: RJHC010643542026 | URN: CRLMB / 19605U / 2026 1. Bhura Ram S/o Hetram, Aged About 52 Years, R/o 14 Bd(A) P.s. Khajuwala Dist. Bikaner (In Judicial Custody At Central Jail, Bikaner) 2. Vikas S/o Bhura Ram, Aged About 25 Years, R/o 14 Bd(A) P.s. Khajuwala Dist. Bikaner (In Judicial Custody At Central Jail, Bikaner) ----Petitioners Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rajendra Singh Chouhan For Respondent(s) : Mr. Hanuman Prajapati, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BALJINDER SINGH SANDHU Order 04/08/2026 Heard learned counsel for the parties, and perused the material available on record. The petitioners have been arrested in connection with FIR No.148/2026 of Police Station Khajuwala, District Bikaner, for the offences punishable under Sections 8/15 of NDPS Act. They have preferred this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the alleged contraband 4 kg 245 grams poppy straw has been recovered and the same has been recovered from backyard of the petitioners and not from the conscious possession of the petitioners which is below commercial quantity. It is stated that there are no criminal [2026:RJ-JP:36451] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-9039/2026] antecedents against the petitioners and the petitioners are behind the bars since 19.06.2026 and the trial is likely to take considerable time to conclude. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application. This Court has considered the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner and finds that the alleged contraband 4 kg 245 grams poppy straw has been recovered and the same has been recovered from the backyard of the petitioners and not from the conscious possession of the petitioners which is below commercial quantity. There are no criminal antecedents against the petitioners and the petitioners are behind the bars since 19.06.2026. Hence, keeping in view the overall facts and circumstances of the case; conclusion of the trial of the case is likely to take time; the narcotic contraband recovered is below commercial quantity; the prosecution has not shown any apprehension of the petitioners fleeing away from justice, in case he is enlarged on bail; but, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I deem it just and proper to grant bail to the petitioner under Section 483 of BNSS. Accordingly, this bail application filed under Section 483 of BNSS is allowed and it is directed that petitioners – Bhura Ram S/o Hetram and Vikas S/o Bhura Ram, shall be released on bail in connection with aforesaid FIR, if not wanted in any other case, provided they executes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sound and solvent sureties of Rs.50,000/- [2026:RJ-JP:36451] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-9039/2026] each to the satisfaction of learned trial court for their appearance before that court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial. (BALJINDER SINGH SANDHU),J 58/Hanuman