Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Delhi · body

2026 DAILYLAW 11627 (DEL)

TRIVENI HOUSEHOLD ITEMS MANUFACTURERS PRIVATE LIMITED v. MR. VIRENDRA KUMAR YADAV TRADING AS YADAV STEEL FURNITURE WORKS

CS(COMM)/543/2026 · 2026-07-08

Jyoti Singh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CS(COMM) 543/2026 $~49 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(COMM) 543/2026 and I.As. 14352/2026 and 14353/2026 TRIVENI HOUSEHOLD ITEMS MANUFACTURERS PRIVATE LIMITED .....Plaintiff Through: Mr. Neeraj Grover, Advocate. versus MR. VIRENDRA KUMAR YADAV TRADING AS YADAV STEEL FURNITURE WORKS .....Defendant Through: Mr. Ravi Chauhan, Ms. Chanderprabha Singh and Mr. Siddharth Verma, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH O R D E R % 08.07.2026 1. This suit is filed on behalf of the Plaintiff inter alia seeking a decree of permanent injunction restraining the Defendant and all others acting on its behalf from selling, offering for sale, advertising, directly or indirectly, dealing in any goods or services under the impugned trademarks TRIVENI/TRIVENI Y/TRIVENI Y ALMIRAH/ and/or any other mark which may be identical to or deceptively similar to Plaintiff’s trademarks TRIVENI/TRIVENI ALMIRAH/ , amounting to infringement and/or passing off. This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/07/2026 at 15:31:31 CS(COMM) 543/2026 2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Defendant, on instructions, submits that Defendant does not wish to contest this suit and is willing to give up use of impugned marks TRIVENI/TRIVENI Y/TRIVENI Y ALMIRAH/ and/or any other mark identical or deceptively similar thereto and undertakes not to use said marks in future. He further submits that Defendant shall withdraw the trademark application bearing No. 6702854 for registration of the mark TRIVENI Y in Class 20, subject to the Plaintiff giving up the reliefs of delivery up, damages and costs. 3. Mr. Neeraj Grover, learned counsel for the Plaintiff, fairly and candidly on instructions, submits that in light of the undertaking given by the Defendant, Plaintiff gives up reliefs of delivery up, damages and costs. 4. In light of the stand taken by the Defendant, which is taken on record and accepted and the stand of the Plaintiff to give up the reliefs aforementioned, the suit is decreed in terms of paragraph 62 (a), (b), (c) and (d) of the plaint, since Plaintiff has given up the reliefs claimed in paragraph 62(e), (f) and (g). Defendant shall file an affidavit of undertaking within a period of two weeks from today. 5. Registry is directed to draw up the decree sheet. 6. Suit stands disposed of along with pending applications. 7. Date of 16.07.2026 before the Joint Registrar stands cancelled. JYOTI SINGH, J JULY 8, 2026/YA This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/07/2026 at 15:31:31