Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 11625 (CHH)

K. RAJSHEKHAR RAO v. K. ANNAPURNA

CRR/625/2023 · 2026-01-21

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:3917 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRR No. 625 of 2023 K. Rajshekhar Rao S/o K. Venugopal Rao, Aged About 45 Years R/o Plot No.20, Kosa Nagar, Street No.06, Supela, Bhilai, District Durg Chhattisgarh. ... Applicant(s) versus 1 - K. Annapurna W/o Shri K. Rajshekhar Rao, Aged About 36 Years Residing House No. 482, Dodekhurd, Housing Board, Vidhan Sabha Raod, Raipur, Tahsil And District Raipur Chhattisgarh. 2 - Minor K. Venu Kartik Rao, S/o Shri K. Rajshekhar Rao Aged About 8 Years Minor Represented Through Mother Non Applicant No. 1 Smt. K. Annapurna. Residing House No. 482, Dodekhurd, Housing Board, Vidhan Sabha Raod, Raipur, Tahsil And District Raipur Chhattisgarh. 3 - Minor K. Naveen Rao, S/o K. Rajshekhar Rao, Aged About 5 Years Minor Represented Through Mother Mother Non Applicant No. 1 Smt. K. Annapurna. Residing House No. 482, Dodekhurd, Housing Board, Vidhan Sabha Raod, Raipur, Tahsil And District Raipur Chhattisgarh. ---- Respondent(s) ______________________________________________________ For Applicant : Mr. Ashish Gupta, Advocate. For Respondents : None present. Hon'ble Mr. Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Order on Board KUNAL DEWANGAN Digitally signed by KUNAL DEWANGAN 2 22.01.2026 1. Heard Mr. Ashish Gupta, learned counsel appearing for the applicant. None present for the respondents. 2. By way of this revision, the applicant has prayed for following relief:- “It is therefore, prayed that this Hon’ble Court kindly be pleased to call the record and allow this revision and further be pleased to set-aside the order dated 24.02.2023 passed in Case No. 140/2020, in the interest of justice.” 3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the case has become infructuous. 4. Accordingly, the present criminal revision is dismissed as having become infructuous without giving any further liberty. 5. The ofÏce is directed to send a certified copy of this order to the Family Court concerned for necessary information and compliance. Sd/- (Ramesh Sinha) Chief Justice Kunal