Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 11625 (BOM)

SMT LILAVATI SUDAMAJI BODAKE (DELETED) v. Ramakant alias Vijaykumar Sudamaji Bodake

IA/11390/2025 · 2026-09-24

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

50-IA-11390-2025-(C).docx IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 11390 OF 2025 Smt Lilavati Sudamaji Bodake (deleted) … Applicant V/s. Ramakant Alias Vijaykumar Sudamaji Bodake … Respondent IN SECOND APPEAL NO. 1100 OF 2006 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1715 OF 2012 IN SECOND APPEAL NO. 1100 OF 2006 Smt Lilavati Sudamaji Bodake And Ors … Applicants V/s. Ramakant @ Vijaykumar Sudamaji Bodake And Ors … Respondents Mr. Venketesh A. Shastry (Through VC), Advocate for the Applicants. CORAM : RAJESH S. PATIL, J. DATED : SEPTEMBER 24, 2026 P.C.: INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 11390 OF 2025 1. This Interim Application is filed to amend the cause title of Civil Application No.1715 of 2012 by impleading the legal heirs of deceased Krishnarao Siddu Bansode. 1/2 adn 50-IA-11390-2025-(C).docx 2. Notices were issued in the present Interim Application. The office record shows that the legal heirs of deceased Krishnarao Sidhu Bansode have been duly served. However, none appears on behalf of the legal heirs of deceased respondent No.4. 3. I have heard the learned Advocate appearing on behalf of the applicant and have gone through the contents of the Interim Application. I am convinced that the present Interim Application needs to be allowed. 4. The Interim Application stands allowed in terms of prayer clause (A). 5. Amendment to be carried out within a period of two weeks from today. (RAJESH S. PATIL, J.) 2/2 adn