AD -13 Ct No.16 03.02.2026 (SSS) FAT 433 of 1989 Sri Nikhil Kumar Bhatta Vs. Smt. Malati Rani Bhatta 1. None appears for the parties at the time of call. 2. We find from the order dated January 20, 2026 that due to non-appearance of the parties on two consecutive occasions, the connected Rule had been discharged on the said date. 3. Even today, at the time of call, none appears to argue the matter. 4. Hence, FAT 433 of 1989 is dismissed for default without any order as to costs. 5. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. (Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya, J.) (Supratim Bhattacharya, J.)