Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Delhi · body

2026 DAILYLAW 11613 (DEL)

SANSPAREILS GREENLANDS PVT LTD v. S GUPTA SPORTS AND ENTERTAINMENT PRIVATE LIMITED

CS(COMM)/258/2026 · 2026-07-08

Jyoti Singh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CS(COMM) 258/2026 $~46 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(COMM) 258/2026 SANSPAREILS GREENLANDS PVT LTD .....Plaintiff Through: Mr. Samrat S. Kang, Advocate. versus S GUPTA SPORTS AND ENTERTAINMENT PRIVATE LIMITED .....Defendant Through: Mr. Dhruv Anand, Mr. Rohil Bansal sand Mr. Chirayu Prahlad, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH O R D E R % 08.07.2026 I.A. 17299/2026 1. This application is jointly filed on behalf of the Plaintiff and Defendant under Order XXIII Rule 3 read with Section 151 CPC for recording of settlement between the said parties. 2. This suit was instituted by the Plaintiff inter alia seeking a decree of permanent injunction restraining the Defendant and all others acting on its behalf from using, selling, advertising, soliciting, manufacturing, marketing, importing, exporting, displaying, offering for sale, or by any other mode or manner, dealing in the course of the trade in physical or online market place, including by way of export and import, packaging and distributing, providing services bearing under impugned trademarks/labels/logos / / / / / / / and This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/07/2026 at 15:32:03 CS(COMM) 258/2026 ‘SG’ marks and/or any other word/label/trade dress/domain name/trade name, which may be identical and/or deceptively similar to the Plaintiff’s trademarks/labels in relation to the impugned goods and/or related/allied goods, amounting to infringement and/or passing off. 3. During the pendency of the suit, parties have settled the disputes amicably and executed a Settlement Agreement dated 06.07.2026, copy of which has been placed on record. For the sake of confidentiality, as agreed between the parties, the terms of settlement are not referred herein. 4. Court has perused the terms of settlement and finds the same to be lawful. Accordingly, this application is allowed and disposed of, recording the settlement between the parties. CS(COMM) 258/2026 5. In light of the settlement between the parties, the suit is decreed. Terms of the Settlement Agreement shall form part of the decree and bind the parties thereto. 6. Registry is directed to draw up the decree sheet. 7. Suit stands disposed of. 8. Plaintiff is held entitled to refund of entire Court fees in accordance with the Court Fees Act, 1870. 9. Dates of 16.09.2026 before Court and 29.07.2026 before learned Joint Registrar stand cancelled. JYOTI SINGH, J JULY 8, 2026/YA This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/07/2026 at 15:32:03