Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 11609 (KAR)

H S CHELUVARAJU v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/21943/2021 · 2026-02-27

K V Aravind, S G Pandit

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:12212-DB WP No. 21943 of 2021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 27TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.G.PANDIT AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. V. ARAVIND WRIT PETITION NO. 21943 OF 2021 (S-KSAT) BETWEEN: 1. H.S. CHELUVARAJU S/O LATE SITARAMU AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS WORKING AS SUB-REGISTRAR OFFICE OF SUB-REGISTRAR SRINGERI, CHIKKAMAGALUR DISTRICT R/A NO.3644, TAPCMS NIZAM MOHALLA, HUNSUR TALUK, MYSORE - 571 105. …PETITIONER (BY SRI S. MARUTHI, ADVOCATE (ABSENT)) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REVENUE DEPARTMENT ROOM NO.505 5TH FLOOR, M.S. BUILDING Digitally signed by VINUTHA B S Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:12212-DB WP No. 21943 of 2021 BENGALURU - 560 001. REPRESENTED ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY. 2. INSPECTOR GENERAL OF REGISTRATION AND COMMISSIONER OF STAMPS KANDAYA BHAVAN 8TH FLOOR, K G ROAD BENGALURU - 560 001. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI VIKAS ROJIPURA. AGA FOR R1 & R2) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO CALL FOR THE ENTIRE RECORDS FROM THE RESPONDENTS, PERTAINING TO ANNEXURE-A AND QUASH THE ORDER DATED 20.05.2020 PASSED BY KARNATAKA STATE ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL IN APPLICATION NO.2035/2012, CERTIFIED COPY OF WHICH IS MARKED AS ANNEXURE-A SINCE THE SAME IS UNJUST AND OPPOSED TO THE PROVISIONS OF TRANSFER GUIDELINES AND ETC,. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.G.PANDIT and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. V. ARAVIND - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:12212-DB WP No. 21943 of 2021 ORAL ORDER (PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.G.PANDIT) None appears for the petitioner. 2. Office objections, including payment of Court fee as well as the cost as ordered by this Court, have not been complied with. 3. It appears that the petitioner has no interest in prosecuting the writ petition. Accordingly, writ petition stands rejected. Sd/- (S.G.PANDIT) JUDGE Sd/- (K. V. ARAVIND) JUDGE DDU List No.: 1 Sl No.: 1