2026:JHHC:4632 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 7920 of 2025 Harinandan Kumar @ Golu, aged about 22 years, son of Vijay Prasad, Resident of village – Hetatoli (Garu) P.O. and P.S. Garu, District - Latehar … … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … … Opposite Party --- CORAM :HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY --- For the Petitioner : Mr. Rajesh Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opp. Party : Mr. Sunil Kumar Dubey, APP --- 07/18.02.2026 Heard the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since 30.05.2025 in connection with Chhipadohar P.S. Case No.10 of 2025, registered under Sections 309 (4) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, now pending in the court of Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Latehar. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is the driver of the informant and he has been falsely implicated in this case and he is in custody since 30.05.2025. 4. The learned counsel for the opposite party has opposed the prayer and submitted that there is recovery of the money of Rs.1,30,000/- from the possession of the petitioner, as mentioned in paragraph 39 of the case diary. It is further submitted that as stated in paragraph 41, a vehicle has also been recovered at the instance of the petitioner. He further submits that paragraph 125 of the case diary reveals that there are three other criminal cases of similar nature registered against the petitioner. 5. To this, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that so far as recovery of vehicle is concerned, that is not the subject matter of the present case. 6. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and considering the fact that upon the confessional statement of the petitioner, money has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner and the petitioner also has criminal antecedents of similar 2026:JHHC:4632 2 nature, this Court is not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. Accordingly, this bail application is rejected. 7. Let a copy of this order be communicated to the learned court concerned through “FAX/email”. (Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.) Date of Order:18.02.2026 Saurav Date of Uploading:18.02.2026