Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 11607 (CHH)

SANTOSH SHUKLA & ANOTHER v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH & ANOTHER

CRMP/180/2020 · 2026-01-13

Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:2146 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 180 of 2020 1 - Santosh Shukla S/o Shri Ramkrishna Shukla Aged About 39 Years R/o C- 45, Shreeji Madhuban Colony, Amlidih, Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Megha Shukla W/o Santosh Shukla Aged About 38 Years R/o C-45, Shreeji Madhuban Colony, Amlidih, Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh --- Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through New Rajendra Nagar Police Station Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Smt. Neha Singh W/o Rohit Singh Aged About 30 Years R/o C-30, Shreeji Madhuban Colony, Amlidih, Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh --- Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Abhishek Vinod Deshmukh, Advocate. For Respondent No. 1 : Mr. Nitansh Jaiswal, Deputy Government Advocate. For Respondent No. 2 : Ms. Veethika Choubey, holding the brief of Mr. T.K.Tiwari, Advocate. Hon’ble Mr. Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon’ble Mr. Ravindra Kumar Agrawal, Judge 2 Judgment on Board Per Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice 14/01/2026 1 Heard Mr. Abhishek Vinod Deshmukh, learned counsel for the petitioner(s), Mr. Nitansh Jaiswal, learned Deputy Government Advocate for the State/respondent No. 1 as well as Ms. Veethika Choubey, learned counsel for the respondent No. 2. 2 The petitioners have filed this petition under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 seeking quashing of Case No. 8575/2018 arising out of FIR No. 57/2018 pending in the Court of Judicial Magistrate First Class, Raipur. 3 At the outset, Mr. Deshmukh, learned counsel for the petitioners submit that this petition has become infructuous as the petitioner No. 1 has been acquitted by the learned trial Court and the there has been a compromise been arrived at between the complainant and the petitioner No. 2, and as such, nothing survives in this petition for adjudication. 4 Learned counsel appearing for other side do not controvert the above submission. 5 In view of the above, this petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Sd/- Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) (Ramesh Sinha) JUDGE CHIEF JUSTICE Amit AMIT KUMAR DUBEY Digitally signed by AMIT KUMAR DUBEY Date: 2026.01.15 12:03:19 +0530