Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 11604 (JHR)

MASTAN RAYEEN ALIAS MOHAMMAD AMIR RAIN ALIAS MD.AMIR ALIAS MASTANA v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

A.B.A./622/2026 · 2026-02-05

Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

( 2026:JHHC:3019 ) -1- A.B.A. No. 622 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 622 of 2026 1. Mastan Rayeen @ Mohammad Amir Rain @ Md. Amir @ Mastana, aged about 30 years, son of Md. Suleman Rain, resident of Village- Koldiha, P.O. & P.S. Giridih Town, District- Giridih 2. Sakir Iqbal @ Taugueer Iqubal, aged about 26 years, son of Md. Nejamuddin, resident of Village Gaddi Mohalla, P.O. & P.S. Giridih Town, District- Giridih 3. Hijing @ Bhutto @ Md. Bhutto, aged about 44 years, son of Md. Kutkut, resident of Hutty Bazar, P.O. & P.S. Giridih Town, District- Giridih 4. Zeeshan @ Zeeshan Ali, aged about 35 years, son of Izharul Hoda, resident of Village Muslim Bazar, P.O. & P.S. Giridih Town, District- Giridih 5. Dilo Quraishi @ Md. Dilshad Quraishi, aged about 22 years, son of Md. Ishrafil Quraishi, resident of Quraishi Mohalla, P.O. & P.S. Giridih Town, District- Giridih 6. Nawed Khan @ Monu @ Nawed Akhtar, aged about 24 years, son of Md. Nasim, resident of Hazi Jamil Road, Bhandaridih, P.O. & P.S. Giridih Town, District- Giridih 7. Guddu Chapta @ Md. Tauhid @ Md. Guddu Quraishi @ Tauhid, aged about 32 years, son of Khalid Qureshi @ Abdul Khalique, resident of Quraishi Mohalla, P.O. & P.S. Giridih Town, District- Giridih … Petitioners -Versus- The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party ----- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI ----- For the Petitioners : Mr. Ankit Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Abhay Kumar Tiwari, A.P.P. ----- 03/05.02.2026 Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and learned counsel appearing for the State. 2. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Jamua P.S. Case No.282 of 2025, registered for the offence under Sections 191(3), 190, 126(2), 324(4), 109 of the BNS and Section 27 of the Arms Act, pending in the Court of the learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Giridih. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that free fight has occurred between two groups of approximately 150 persons each of the groups relating to construction of a building on a particular land. He further ( 2026:JHHC:3019 ) -2- A.B.A. No. 622 of 2026 submits that there are general and omnibus allegations against all the accused persons and nobody has received any injury. 4. Learned counsel appearing for the State opposed the prayer and submits that the allegations are there of free fight between two groups. 5. Considering that approximately 150 persons were involved in both groups in free fight for the dispute relating to construction of a building on a particular land and there are general and omnibus allegations against all the accused persons and there is no injury upon anybody and in the attending facts and circumstances of the case, I am inclined to extend the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioners. 6. Accordingly, the above-named petitioners are directed to surrender before the learned Court within three weeks from today and in the event of their arrest or surrender, they shall be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Giridih in connection with Jamua P.S. Case No.282 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. (Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Dated: 5th February, 2026 Ajay/