Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 116 (HP)

UDHO RAM v. STATE OF HP

CRMPM/296/2026 · 2026-03-05

Rakesh Kainthla

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Cr. MP(M) No. 296 of 2026 Date of Decision : 05.03.2026 Udho Ram ....Petitioner Versus State of H.P. ....Respondent Coram Hon’ble Mr Justice Rakesh Kainthla, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? No For the petitioner : Mr. Vasu Sood, Advocate. For the respondent/State : Mr. Ajit Sharma, Deputy Advocate General. Rakesh Kainthla, Judge (Oral) Notice. Mr. Ajit Sharma, learned Deputy Advocate General appears and waives service of notice on behalf of respondent/State. 2. Learned counsel representing the petitioner, under instructions, submits that he wants to withdraw the present petition. Permission granted. 3. In view of the above, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn, so also the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any. (Rakesh Kainthla) Judge 5th March, 2026 (Nikita)