bipin prithiani 1 38-wp-12673.26.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 12673 OF 2026 Raisoni Kothari Builders LLP … Petitioner Versus Pune Municipal Corporation … Respondent ****** Mr. Kamlesh Ghumre a/w Ms. Sonali Jadhav and Mr. Aryan Mehta for Petitioner. ****** CORAM : MANISH PITALE AND SHREERAM V. SHIRSAT, JJ. DATE : 28th SEPTEMBER 2026 P.C. : . The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that although this writ petition challenges warrants of attachment purportedly issued by respondent-Pune Municipal Corporation, it has subsequently come to light that such warrants of attachment were actually not issued. It is submitted that therefore, the petitioner has instructed the learned counsel to withdraw the present writ petition, but with liberty to file a fresh petition in order to raise the issue of priority of the secured creditor over and above the property tax dues of the respondent-Corporation, in the light of the fact that the petitioner is an auction purchaser, in pursuance of proceedings undertaken by a secured creditor under the provisions of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002. BIPIN DHARMENDER PRITHIANI Digitally signed by BIPIN DHARMENDER PRITHIANI Date: 2026.09.28 18:02:57 +0530 bipin prithiani 2 38-wp-12673.26.doc 2. It is noted that copy of an email dated 21st September 2026 addressed by the petitioner to the Advocate is placed on record with the praecipe dated 22nd September 2026. The praecipe and copy of the said email are taken on record. 3. In view of the above, the writ petition is disposed of as withdrawn, with liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh petition to raise the said issue, noted hereinabove. (SHREERAM V. SHIRSAT, J.) (MANISH PITALE, J.)