Page No.# 1/4 GAHC010006122025 2026:GAU-AS:10630 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/214/2025 DIBAKAR THAKURIA S/O- LATE LOHIT CHANDRA THAKURIA, PERMANENT R/O- MEDHIKUCHI, P.O- HATHINAPUR, DIST- BARPETA, ASSAM, PIN-781325 VERSUS THE UNION OF INDIA AND 8 ORS REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO THE MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS, GOVT. OF INDIA, NEW DELHI-01 2:THE DIRECTOR GENERAL CENTRAL INDUSTRIAL SECURITY FORCE BLOCK NO. 13 CGO COMPLEX LODHI ROAD NEW DELHI-03 3:DIRECTORATE GENERAL OF WORKS CENTRAL PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT (CPWD) NIRMAN BHAWAN NEW DELHI-11 4:DIRECTORATE OF ESTATES NIRMAN BHAWAN NEW DELHI-11 5:THE COMMANDANT CENTRAL INDUSTRIAL SECURITY FORCE NORTH EASTERN SECTOR HQRS Page No.# 2/4 GUWAHATI ASSAM PIN-781040 6:THE ASSISTANT COMMANDANT CENTRAL INDUSTRIAL SECURITY FORCE NORTH EASTERN SECTOR HQRS GUWAHATI ASSAM PIN-781040 7:THE SENIOR COMMANDANT CENTRAL INDUSTRIAL SECURITY FORCE UNIT OIL DULIAJAN DIST- DIBRUGARH ASSAM PIN-786602 8:THE SSISTANT COMMANDANT/QM CENTRAL INDUSTRIAL SECURITY FORCE UNIT OIL DULIAJAN DIST- DIBRUGARH ASSAM PIN-786602 9:EXECUTIVE ENGINEER ASSAM AVIATION DIVISION CENTRAL PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT KAHIKUCHI BAZAR BORJHAR GUWAHATI PIN-78101 For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. M. Mahanta, Advocate For the Respondent(s) : Mr. D. J. Das, Advocate Page No.# 3/4 BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH O R D E R 31.07.2026 Heard Mr. M. Mahanta, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioner. Mr. D. J. Das, the learned counsel appears on behalf of the Respondents Nos.1 to 9. 2. This Court duly takes note of that vide the order dated 16.06.2026, the present proceedings were referred to a Mediator for an amicable settlement by way of mediation. This Court further takes note of that the Mediator has submitted a Memorandum of Settlement dated 31.07.2026 which is kept on record and marked with the letter "X." 3. This Court has duly heard the learned counsels appearing on behalf of the parties and has also perused the Memorandum of Settlement. The said Memorandum of Settlement is kept on record and marked with the letter "X." 4. It is the opinion of this Court that the Memorandum of Settlement so arrived at is a fair resolution to the dispute raised in the present proceedings and the same has been arrived at without any fraud and coercion. 5. This Court also takes note of the submission of Mr. D. J. Page No.# 4/4 Das, the learned counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 9 that the present settlement is specific to the Petitioner and should not be treated as a precedence. 6. Accordingly, the parties to the present proceedings shall be bound by the terms and conditions of the Memorandum of Settlement which is kept on record and marked with the letter "X". The terms of the Memorandum of Settlement shall be deemed to be directions passed by this Court. 7. This Court also observes that the Terms of Settlement entered into in the present proceedings shall be specific to the Petitioner only and shall not later on be applied as a precedent for other cases. 8. With the above, the instant writ petition stands disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant