Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 11594 (ALL)

ABRAR AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

NABAIL/9967/2026 · 2026-09-29

Rajiv Lochan Shukla

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 9967 of 2026 Court No. - 71 HON'BLE RAJIV LOCHAN SHUKLA, J. 1. After some arguments, Learned counsel for the applicants prays that he may be permitted to approach the concerned Court for seeking regular bail. He further prays that for a short time, the interest of the applicants may be protected. 2. The Learned AGA and Shri Manish Kumar Pandey, Learned counsel for the informant have no objection to the said prayer. 3. Taking into account the submissions made by the Learned counsel for the parties, it is directed that in case the applicants appear before the Court concerned within a period of four weeks from today and apply for bail in Case Crime No.216/2026, under Sections 109(1), 115(2), 352, 351(3) BNS, Police Station Kiratpur, District Bijnor, their application for bail shall be considered and disposed of expeditiously, in accordance with the law, without being influenced by any observations made by the concerned Court while rejecting the anticipatory bail application of the applicants. 4. For a period of four weeks from today, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicants in the aforesaid case. 5. With the aforesaid observations/directions, this application stands disposed of. September 30, 2026/A. Pandey Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Pavan Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Manish Kumar Pandey (Rajiv Lochan Shukla,J.) Abrar And Another .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- ANAND PANDEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad