Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 11591 (PAT)

Abhishek Mongiya v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./22118/2026 · 2026-04-08

Sandeep Kumar

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.22118 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-180 Year-2025 Thana- KARPI District- Arwal ====================================================== Abhishek Mongiya Son of Saka @ Saka Mongiya Resident of Village- Datiya Prakash Nagar, P.S.- Civil Lines Datiyaand, Distt.- Datiya, State- Madhya Pradesh ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Amaresh Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Ram Sevak Choudhary, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 2 08-04-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. 2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Karpi P.S. Case No. 180/2025 registered for the offences punishable under Section 303(2) of B.N.S. 3. As per the prosecution case, three miscreants committed theft of about Rs. 18 lakhs from a bank when the cashier was talking with someone on a mobile phone. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has falsely been implicated in the case. No incriminating articles has been recovered from his possession. Learned counsel further submits that he has no criminal antecedent and he is in custody since 06.12.2025. The petitioner Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.22118 of 2026(2) dt.08-04-2026 2/2 undertakes to co-operate in the case/ trial. 5. Learned APP for the State has opposed the prayer for regular bail of the petitioner on the ground that petitioner was keeping a watch and when he saw that the cashier was talking on a phone then he signalled someone and other co- accused escaped with the money. A sum of Rs. 8 lakhs has been recovered from the co-accused, who has named the petitioner in his self-inculpatory statement. 6. Considering the aforesaid facts as well as the fact that the petitioner is the resident of Madhya Pradesh and has come to Bihar to commit crime, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. 7. Accordingly, this application stands dismissed. tusharika/- (Sandeep Kumar, J) U T