GIRISH CHANDRA DEKA v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 3 ORS
WP(C)/1323/2016 · 2026-07-30
Devashis Baruah
Writ Petition (Civil)body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 11590 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 11590 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010107932016
2026:GAU-AS:10621
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/1323/2016 GIRISH CHANDRA DEKA S/O LT. TARA NATH DEKA, R/O M.G. ROAD, NEAR RAJ BHAWAN, P.O.
UZANBAZAR, P.S. LATASIL, DIST- KAMRUP METRO, ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 3 ORS REP. BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECY. TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM REVENUE DEPTT., DISPUR, GHY-6, DIST- KAMRUP METRO, ASSAM 2:THE DY. COMMISSIONER KAMRUP METRO GHY-1 DIST- KAMRUP METRO ASSAM 3:THE COMMISSIONER GUWAHATI MUNICIPAL COMMISSIONER GHY-1 4:THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER PWD ROAD GUWAHATI CITY DIVISION-II CHANDMARI GHY-2 For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. M. J. Baruah, Advocate
For the Respondent(s) : Ms. N. Bordoloi, SC, Revenue Mr. S. Borah, SC, GMC Mr. M. Bhuyan, SC PWDR
Page No.# 2/3
BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH O R D E R
31.07.2026
Heard Mr. M. J. Baruah, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioner. Ms. N. Bordoloi, the learned counsel appears on behalf of the Revenue Department; Mr. S. Borah, the learned counsel appears on behalf of the GMC and Mr. M. Bhuyan, the learned counsel appears on behalf of the PWD (Roads).
2. Mr. M. J. Baruah, the learned counsel for the Petitioner submitted that taking into account the stand which has been taken by the Respondent Authorities to the effect that only the land covered by Dag No.1381 (new) has been used for the purpose of construction of the road and disputed questions arise as to whether it is the land of the Petitioner wherein construction has been carried out, the Petitioner would not like to pursue the present proceedings. The learned counsel for the Petitioner, however, submitted that the withdrawal of the instant writ petition should not affect the rights of the Petitioner to approach
Page No.# 3/3 the competent Court of Civil Jurisdiction or the appropriate forum, if so advised.
3. Taking into account the above, the instant writ petition stands closed on withdrawal.
4. Liberty is granted to the Petitioner to approach the appropriate forum, if so advised.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant