M/S GULAM MUSTAFA ENTERPRISES PVT LTD v. STATE BANK OF INDIA
WP/31628/2025 · 2026-02-16
Lalitha Kanneganti
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 11589 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 11589 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:9493 WP No. 31628 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI WRIT PETITION NO. 31628 OF 2025 (GM-DRT) BETWEEN:
M/S. GULAM MUSTAFA ENTERPRISES PVT. LTD., A COMPANY REGISTERED UNDER COMPANIES ACT, 2013 REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTORS, MR. GULAM MUSTAFA, HAVING REGISTERED OFFICE AT G M PEARL, B.T.M. LAYOUT, IST STAGE, BENGALURU-560 068
ALSO AT NO.44/1, AZEEM PEARL, DICKENSON ROAD, HALASUR, BENGALURU-560 008. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. SWAROOP S., ADVOCATE) AND:
1.
STATE BANK OF INDIA STRESSED ASSETS MANAGEMENT BRANCH BENGALURU, HAVING OFFICE AT 2ND FLOOR, OFFICE COMPLEX BUILDING, LHO CAMPUS, NO.65, ST. MARKS ROAD, BENGALURU-560001 REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGER
Digitally signed by SUVARNA T Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:9493 WP No. 31628 of 2025
2.
M/S. RAYALASEEMA ENTERPRISES HAVING PARTNERSHIP FIRM OFFICE AT DOOR NO.12, WARD NO.33, VINAYAK NAGAR, HOSPET ROAD, BALLARI-583104 REPRESENTED BY ITS PROPRIETOR …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. ASHOK KUMAR M., ADVOCATE FOR R1)
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI OR ANY OTHER ORDER OR DIRECTION SETTING ASIDE THE LETTER DATED 29.04.2025 ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.1 IN FAVOUR OF RESPONDENT NO.2 BEARING NO. SBI/SAMB/CLO- 1/GMEPL/FY2025-26/23 AND CONSEQUENTLY DIRECT THE RESPONDENTS TO RETURN THE SAID SCHEDULE TRUCKS AS MENTIONED AT PARA-NO.7 TO THIS PETITION. (ANNEXURE-E) AND ETC.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:9493 WP No. 31628 of 2025
ORAL ORDER
The learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo seeking permission of this Court to withdraw this writ petition.
2. The memo is taken on record. In view of the memo, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
3. All IA’s in the petition shall stand closed.
SD/- (LALITHA KANNEGANTI) JUDGE HJ List No.: 1 Sl No.: 12