Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 11587 (GAU)

TAJAL HOQUE AND 2 ORS v. THE UNION OF INDIA AND 4 ORS

WP(C)/139/2026 · 2026-07-30

Devashis Baruah

Writ Petition (Civil)body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010283762025 2026:GAU-AS:10627 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/139/2026 TAJAL HOQUE AND 2 ORS S/O- SHAKBAR ALI, R/O- VILLAGE- GALANDI CHA BAGISA, POLICE STATION- DHULA, DISTRICT- DARRANG (ASSAM), PIN- 784190 2: MAINUL HOQUE S/O- ABDUL MAJID R/O- VILLLAGE GALANDI CHA BAGISA POLICE STATION- DHULA DISTRICT- DARRANG (ASSAM) PIN- 784190 3: MAJIBAR RAHMAN S/O- JUNAB ALI R/O- VILLLAGE GALANDI CHA BAGISA POLICE STATION- DHULA DISTRICT- DARRANG (ASSAM) PIN- 78419 VERSUS THE UNION OF INDIA AND 4 ORS MINISTRY OF PETROLEUM AND NATURAL GAS OF THE GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, A-WING, SHASTRI RAJENDRA PRASAD ROAD, 110001, AZAD BHAWAN RD, IP ESTATE, NEW DELHI- 110002 2:THE UNDER SECRETARY MINISTRY OF PETROLEUM AND NATURAL GAS OF THE GOVERNMENT OF INDIA A-WING SHASTRI RAJENDRA PRASAD ROAD 110001 AZAD BHAWAN RD IP ESTATE NEW DELHI- 110002 Page No.# 2/3 3:THE COMPETENT AUTHORITY (ASSAM) INDRADHANUSH GAS GRID LIMITED (IGGL) INDUSTRY AND COMMMERCE DEPARTMENT BLOCK-D 3RD FLOOR ASSAM SECRETARIAT DISPUR GUWAHATI ASSAM- 781006 4:THE INDRADHANUSH GAS GRID LIMITED (IGGL) 7TH FLOOR NRL CENTRE 122A G.S.ROAD CHRISTIAN BASTI GUWAHATI ASSAM- 781005 5:NUMALIGARH REFINERY LTD (NGL) REPRESENTED BY SR. CHIEF GENERAL MANAGER (HR AND L) 122A G.S.ROAD CHRISTIAN BASTI GUWAHATI ASSAM- 78100 Advocate for the petitioner(s): Mr. P Upadhyay Advocate for the respondent(s): Mr. SS Roy For respondent Nos.1 and 2 Mr. S Sharma For respondent Nos.3, 4 and 5 B E F O R E HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH ORDER 31.07.2026 Page No.# 3/3 Mr. P Upadhyay, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners submits that he has instructions to withdraw the instant writ petition. 2. Mr. SS Roy, the learned counsel appears on behalf of the respondent Nos.1 and 2 and Mr. S Sharma, the learned counsel appears on behalf of the respondent Nos.3, 4 and 5 respectively. 3. Taking into account the above, the writ petition stands closed on withdrawal. 4. Interim order, if any, stands closed. JUDGE Comparing Assistant