Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 1158 (GAU)

MAJMUL HOQUE ALIAS MOJMUL HOQUE v. THE STATE OF ASSAM

Bail Appln./11/2026 · 2026-01-18

Sanjeev Kumar Sharma

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010000802026 2026:GAU-AS:568 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Bail Appln./11/2026 MAJMUL HOQUE ALIAS MOJMUL HOQUE S/O MOMTAZ ALI MONTAJ ALI, R/O VILL. DANGAIGAON, P.S. BIJNI, DIST. CHIRANG, ASSAM, PIN 783390 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE PP, ASSAM. Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. A A MONDAL, MR. B HUSSAIN,MR A ALAM,MR R A AHMED Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, B E F O R E HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV KUMAR SHARMA ORDER 19.01.2026 Heard Mr. A.A. Mondal, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. P. Borthakur, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State of Assam. This is an application under Section 483 of the BNSS praying for bail of the Page No.# 2/2 accused, namely, Md Majmul Hoque @ Mojmul Hogue, who is in detention since 25.11.2025 in connection with STF P.S. Case No. 04/2018 under Section 379 of IPC. Perused the FIR and also the documents annexed there with. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since 56 days and the stolen articles have also been recovered. Having considered the nature of allegations and the length of detention in custody, I am of the view that no further detention is necessary. Accordingly, the accused above named is allowed to be enlarged on bail of Rs. 20,000/- with a suitable surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned CJM, Kamrup(M). The bail application stands disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant